Saffron: You won't tell anyone about me breaking down? Mal: I won't. Saffron: Then I won't tell anyone how easily I got your gun out of your holster. Mal: I'll take that as a kindness.

'Trash'


Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!  

We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!


Kat - Aug 20, 2003 7:37:46 am PDT #2969 of 10289
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

Katie, that's what I was thinking too. Maybe it's a "Genre TV We Love" so we can combine Smallville, Due South and Farscape?


Sean K - Aug 20, 2003 7:42:52 am PDT #2970 of 10289
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

I dunno - it feels really artificial to me. Why do we need two topics? Farscape's had eight posts in the last week.

Well, the Farscape peeps really aren't about the HoYay (even though it sometimes comes up over there). If we broadened it to Sci-Fi, I think it would get more traffic. Discussion about Stargate would be suitable, I think, as would discussion of Highlander (another show discussed in dS).

But my problem is the discussion of Highlander, and sometimes Stargate, is really all about the HoYay, and while that's fine and fun, it doesn't really fit well with the Farscape style discussion and I don't want to deny the HoYay peeps a place to talk about that.

Those two categories don't seem artifical to me. Serious discussion of genre/fannish type shows is good, and discussion of HoYay is good, but they strike me as unmixy things. If I'm having a serious conversation about Stargate, it would be annoying to have to deal with talk of Jack and Daniel making a cute couple in that same discussion. Neither discussion is more legitimate than the other, but they deserve seperate spaces to take place.

Yes, they're all shows that inspire fannish behavior, but there are different ways to be a fan about a show, and creating seperate categories for the seperate types of fannishness only makes sense (well, to me anyway, and y'all know that I'm right all the time, right?)


Lyra Jane - Aug 20, 2003 7:43:41 am PDT #2971 of 10289
Up with the sun

Doesn't a Fannish TV thread have the same spoilage problems as a general TV thread?


Katie M - Aug 20, 2003 7:44:11 am PDT #2972 of 10289
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies

Yeah, Kat, that's my personal headspace. It won't be any skin off my nose if we go another way, though.


Steph L. - Aug 20, 2003 7:45:08 am PDT #2973 of 10289
I look more rad than Lutheranism

Yes, they're all shows that inspire fannish behavior, but there are different ways to be a fan about a show

To be fair, we've done it with Buffy and, more notably, Angel. There have been side-by-side conversations where one was nothing but HoYay and the other was serious. We can handle that in one thread.


sumi - Aug 20, 2003 7:46:58 am PDT #2974 of 10289
Art Crawl!!!

Right. I think that the main divider is whether the show is producing new episodes or not. . . because Due South and Highlander are not -- but nobody seems to mind spoilers about SG-1. (For whatever reason.)

Spoilers for The O.C. or Smallville maybe more problematic.


Kat - Aug 20, 2003 7:48:01 am PDT #2975 of 10289
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

Doesn't a Fannish TV thread have the same spoilage problems as a general TV thread?

Yep. Hence a problem. I was working of Consuela's original suggestion for combining the three that was given here: Consuela "Bureaucracy 2: Like Sartre, Only Longer" Aug 19, 2003 9:25:28 am PDT. The reality is we have all threads for all three of these shows. If we consolidate (and it seems that of the people we have heard from, there are many people who like that idea), is there a way to get to one thread from three?


Katie M - Aug 20, 2003 7:50:20 am PDT #2976 of 10289
I was charmed (albeit somewhat perplexed) by the fannish sensibility of many of the music choices -- it's like the director was trying to vid Canada. --loligo on the Olympic Opening Ceremonies

Yes, they're all shows that inspire fannish behavior, but there are different ways to be a fan about a show, and creating seperate categories for the seperate types of fannishness only makes sense (well, to me anyway, and y'all know that I'm right all the time, right?)

No! No! Me! My definitions! Serious and HoYay discussions are totally mixy things!

Er, yeah, so there's the point of confusion, I guess. Again, I don't feel that strongly about it. Whatever's decided, I'm sure I'll settle in. I'm also sure that I'll merrily discuss HoYay if I'm in the mood in the Sci-Fi thread, though; my personal method of discussion for Farscape and Stargate and Highlander is all pretty much the same.


Sean K - Aug 20, 2003 7:58:00 am PDT #2977 of 10289
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty

To be fair, we've done it with Buffy and, more notably, Angel.

Very true.

(and it seems that of the people we have heard from, there are many people who like that idea)...

Oh yeah. I'm coming at this from the Farscape angle, and like the idea of a Sci-Fi thread that keeps the tone I'm used to over there, but in the end I really don't care. If we decide to just put them all together in Fannish TV, I'll be okay with that too.

is there a way to get to one thread from three?

We could just cram them all together. But like Lyra Jane points out, Fannish TV has similar problems to a general TV thread. Not sure how to solve those problems.


Consuela - Aug 20, 2003 7:58:43 am PDT #2978 of 10289
We are Buffistas. This isn't our first apocalypse. -- Pix

I'll speak up here as the individual who campaigned to start the Farscape thread to begin with.

I have no problems with consolidation, although yes I can understand that someone who watches only Farscape and not DS, Smallville, SG-1 or Highlander might have a hard time wading through the thread to find the posts that interest them.

I don't see the big disjunction that Sean seems to: fannish analysis for me runs the spectrum from "hummina hummina" at John Crichton in leather or Methos/Duncan subtext to detailed critical discussion about how the entire tone of the show changed after Zhaan or Richie were killed. They're all genre shows with greater or lesser amounts of ongoing plot lines and evolving characterizations, and they inspire similar types of fannish responses.

That said, I don't know that it would make a big difference anyway in the short term, because the Farscape thread isn't getting a lot of traffic and probably won't until the show comes back in S5 or in daily reruns. Generally if someone stops by the DueSouth thread and says, "Hey, I have a Highlander question" everyone is happy to stop talking about the Ray wars and chat about the mechanics of a Quickening for a couple of dozen posts.

um. Anyway, that was rambling.