I'm with four month, rather than three as the alternative.
Lorne: Snakes? Uh-huh. And they came out of your what? Okay. Okay, well, did they get up there themselves or is this part of a, you know, a thing? No, I'm not judging...Do we fight snakes? Angel: Only if they're giant. Or demons. Or giant demons. Are they giant demon snakes? Lorne: Well, unless this guy's 30 feet tall, I'm thinking they're of the garden variety.
'Lineage'
Voting Discussion: We're Screwing In Light Bulbs AIFG!
We open it up, we talks the talk, we votes, we shuts it down. This thread is to free up Bureaucracy for daily details as we hammer out the Big Issues towards a vote. Open only when a proposal has been made and seconded according to Buffista policy (Which we voted on!). If this thread is closed, hie thee to Bureaucracy instead!
Typo Boy - Mar 21, 2003 6:17:45 pm PST #207 of 10289
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.
Liese S. - Mar 21, 2003 10:40:36 pm PST #208 of 10289
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."
I woulda pushed for 12. I would like to point out that although the Phoenix may be six months old, the original TT topic dates back six years. But I'm late to the party, so carry on.
I see 3 months as a more logical division of the year than 4, and so would put it on the ballot. I would still vote for the highest number, though, personally.
Typo Boy - Mar 21, 2003 10:51:01 pm PST #209 of 10289
Calli: My people have a saying. A man who trusts can never be betrayed, only mistaken.Avon: Life expectancy among your people must be extremely short.
Yeah - but I think the people who support six should defer to the people who want a lower alternative on what the alternative should be. Four months has a better chance of beating six than three months. And I do think six is too long.
Rebecca Lizard - Mar 21, 2003 11:46:05 pm PST #210 of 10289
You sip / say it's your crazy / straw say it's you're crazy / as you bicycle your soul / with beauty in your basket
You know what's weird? Is that, as Jess (I think) pointed out, 6 months ago was the site's birth, and that feels like foreverago, but 3 months ago was when mieskie was suspended, and that feels like yesterday.
Not to me.
Yeah - but I think the people who support six should defer to the people who want a lower alternative on what the alternative should be. Four months has a better chance of beating six than three months. And I do think six is too long.
Wrod.
Ballot:
1) 6 months
2) 4 months
3) fnord
P.M. Marc - Mar 22, 2003 12:58:51 am PST #211 of 10289
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
I change my vote to fnord.
Although in a perfect world, that would be whitefonted.
Edit, but seriously, I still think that quarterly or biannually is the best way to go.
So, I'm firm with three/six.
Or some combination, where three for everything BUT new threads, and six for new threads.
RobertH - Mar 22, 2003 5:51:42 am PST #212 of 10289
Disaffected college student
Anything other than an integral number of months will just get confusing.
-7 months!
I want 6 months, for no better reason (although I think it's a damn fine reason) than it'll make Bureaucracy ever-so-slightly easier to read than would 3 or 4.
Sean K - Mar 22, 2003 10:39:20 am PST #213 of 10289
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty
Pi months! Pi months!
Only after months of Pi
Let the digits be our cry
3.1415926535897932384626433832795028841971693993751058209...
::ahem:::
Sorry, sorry.
As for real content, I'm actually intrigued by Plei's 6 months for thread requests, 3 months for evertyhing else, but I wonder what else we'll be voting on, other than thread creation.
Burrell - Mar 22, 2003 10:43:38 am PST #214 of 10289
Why did Darth Vader cross the road? To get to the Dark Side!
but I wonder what else we'll be voting on, other than thread creation.
Er, thread uncreation (When is it time to end a thread?), thread reorganization (Should X and Y be combined into one thread?) both come to mind, official banning procedures (if we decide to codify them). So I can think of a few other things.
Jon B. - Mar 22, 2003 10:45:49 am PST #215 of 10289
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!
I closed an open italics tag in Sean's post.
Sean K - Mar 22, 2003 10:57:24 am PST #216 of 10289
You can't leave me to my own devices; my devices are Nap and Eat. -Zenkitty
Er, thread uncreation (When is it time to end a thread?), thread reorganization (Should X and Y be combined into one thread?) both come to mind, official banning procedures (if we decide to codify them). So I can think of a few other things.
Thanks Burrell, I thought there might be things like that, but I just wasn't coming up with any. I have perhaps not had enough caffeine yet this morning.
I closed an open italics tag in Sean's post.
Thanks Jon. (whoops)