Years ago, I saw a video of a man receiving oral sex from a woman and then from a man, to see who did a better job. He reported that the woman was better, which was nice to hear, but from that small a sample size, I wouldn't generalize. Sounds like this guy didn't have a sample size that was more representative.
Spike's Bitches 49: As usual, I'm here to help you, and I... are you naked under there?
Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
It would seem not. Can you imagine posting that? And that thinking your credentials make a better point? I can't, even though I share a lot.
Sounds like this guy didn't have a sample size that was more representative.
Plus I would really think that the overall range of individual performance is going to far outweigh any general overall difference in skill between genders. Not to mention the difference in what an individual might consider “good”!
Enthusiasm and willingness to take instruction goes a long way.
There is just so much to unpack there, buddy. So much.
Yes. Definitely hope this isn't a movie scenario where I know this person and don't know it.
What is it with men and there really bad hot takes about women and sex
Like the dude who was explaining that women shouldn't get wet when aroused. Or really wet. I think maybe he change this answer slightly.
To be fair, it can be difficult to talk about things you never witnessed.
*snerk!*
Well, thanks. The sad part is that if these dudes posted in the spirit of inquiry, Dan Savage or Dr. Internet, et all might be able to help. But they always act like, when they screw, they are really looking to disprove the Loch Ness Monster or go on mythbusters. (Not that there *isn't* mythology going around about that topic, of course.) But I think it's supposed to be loving(or at least fun)