Given the fact that the Supreme Court is frequently ruling on things that affect my entire gender, I feel pretty comfortable excluding someone who's behaved that way towards a woman. I mean, boo fucking hoo, asshole.

I'm really angry about the whole thing, though. And I'm also about to kill my coworker, who is sharing her screen with me AND reading me the multi-paragraph email draft that I can see.

That ship sailed within the first 24 hours after Dr Ford came forward.

Yeah, I agree that it's too late now regardless. I was thinking as a hypothetical. I listened to Emily Bazelon's take too and thought it was really good.

But everything else about his behavior tells me he's not a good man who did something bad long ago; he's a bad guy, then and now.

There are definitely other red flags.

There are definitely other red flags.

I mean the fact that he was nominated by a criminal for the sole purpose of excusing that person's criminal behavior was pretty damning to begin with.

TCG came home with the biggest head of cabbage I have ever seen yesterday. It must weigh 5 lbs. another gift from a fellow employee. I have no idea what to do with it.

Sauerkraut would be my answer to this, but I realize not everyone likes it.

What SHOULD be an automatic disqualification is that he is now, at age 53, lying about it to Congress and to the American public, which is unacceptable behavior both in general and especially for a federal judge and REALLY REALLY ESPECIALLY for a Supreme Court Justice.

100% this. I mean, I broke the law plenty in high school (in areas other than sexual assault!!), but I would admit it and I AM NOT BEING NOMINATED FOR THE SUPREME COURT.

Of course, I want him to be disqualified for all of the other lies he's been telling, never mind his actual positions.

Caught-lying Kavanaugh is not an appropriate choice for the Supreme Court.

I sexually harrassed someone in college, it might qualify as assault. I had no physical dominance in the situation, so his safety was never in question, but that hardly seems the point.

My headspace around the issue is not great, but its also not confused. This behavior is unacceptable even once.

The fact that Kavenaugh will be in a position to rule on any woman's body in any way, means his behavior toward some is germaign to the topic. And that he has offered no kind of apology, is relevant. Also, fuck him!

What SHOULD be an automatic disqualification is that he is now, at age 53, lying about it to Congress and to the American public, which is unacceptable behavior both in general and especially for a federal judge and REALLY REALLY ESPECIALLY for a Supreme Court Justice.

This, absolutely.

Space-related semi-problem -- do I keep my Buffy and Angel DVDs? I haven't watched them in so long they're covered in dust, and they're available streaming. But there's that little part of me that whispers, what if someday they're not? Hmmm.

Probably too late, but my answer to the cabbage would be Kalua Pork and Cabbage (ideally made in an instant pot, but that's just 'cause it's easy).

I agree with the "(metaphorically) fuck that guy" responses on Kavanaugh. He also seems to be eminently blackmail-able, which is also exactly what you want in a justice t /irony font

BUT, assuming that's where we end up, they should feel free to burn another week or two before they give up on him.

I agree with Emily Bazelon's take (which she articulated on the Gabfest, not sure if there's a written version) - more or less that we should take into account that he was a minor at the time and unless more women come forward to demonstrate a pattern of behavior extending into adulthood (which has not happened, yet), one criminal act as a minor should not be an automatic disqualification. What SHOULD be an automatic disqualification is that he is now, at age 53, lying about it to Congress and to the American public, which is unacceptable behavior both in general and especially for a federal judge and REALLY REALLY ESPECIALLY for a Supreme Court Justice.

I didn't hear Bazelon's take, but what Jessica said seems right to me.

I thought this piece by Caitlin Flanagan in The Atlantic was thoughtful.

Trigger warning: the writer was sexually assaulted, but the piece is not graphic and the boy stopped and later apologized to her.