Riley: Oh, yeah. Sorry 'bout last time. Heard I missed out on some fun. Xander: Oh yeah, fun was had. Also frolic, merriment and near-death hijinks.

'Never Leave Me'


Natter 70: Hookers and Blow  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


§ ita § - Sep 16, 2012 11:10:37 am PDT #22287 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Uh, I'm sorry we didn't manage to do the correct pantomime of misery? I'm not sure what to say to that other than clearly our tourist board is pretty good, and I guess you guys don't get what the third world is.


§ ita § - Sep 16, 2012 11:13:43 am PDT #22288 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Connie, seriously? That's your definition? That's what you're challenging my definition of my home on? Normal Americans don't go there? I don't think the World Bank uses travel agents as consultants, but that could be a thing.


Amy - Sep 16, 2012 11:14:24 am PDT #22289 of 30001
Because books.

People vacationed in Haiti, right? I don't think there's a question Haiti is third world as popularly defined now, although aurelia's link seems to say it was originally a much more political distinction than an economic one.


NoiseDesign - Sep 16, 2012 11:15:04 am PDT #22290 of 30001
Our wings are not tired

I've been through Jamaica outside of the resorts, and it's third world. Just because a huge company can build a multimillion dollar resort on the beach doesn't mean there isn't a huge amount of poverty just outside the walled garden of that resort.


Connie Neil - Sep 16, 2012 11:16:39 am PDT #22291 of 30001
brillig

I see it as "third world" being folks struggling to make ends meet in various levels, ranging from being pretty damned appalling that people in the 21st century allow to persist, to life is tough but we're coping, thank you, though the occasional hand is appreciated. Third World, as used in political and social commentaries et al., has become as much a brand as anything. Useful shorthand. Too often a phrase you can use when you don't want to spend the brain space to actually realize there are people involved.


NoiseDesign - Sep 16, 2012 11:19:18 am PDT #22292 of 30001
Our wings are not tired

I see it as "third world" being folks struggling to make ends meet in various levels, ranging from being pretty damned appalling that people in the 21st century allow to persist, to life is tough but we're coping, thank you, though the occasional hand is appreciated.

I've seen that in almost every Caribbean port I've been to while working on cruise ships.


§ ita § - Sep 16, 2012 11:30:06 am PDT #22293 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

So you have been to Jamaica after all, Connie?

I mentioned to some of the people here that people were saying we weren't 3rd world, and the response was "they're joking, though?" I mentioned the vacation thing, and the response was "that's the definition of 3rd world!"

There really isn't any question about endemic poverty. It's not up for debate.

I doubt there's a 3rd world country without rich people, or without a middle class. It's what the middle class takes for granted, and the gap between them and the lower class, never mind the size of the latter.


Hil R. - Sep 16, 2012 11:53:18 am PDT #22294 of 30001
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l

I tried asking my parents whether Jamaica was a third world country, without giving them the context of this conversation, to see what they'd say. My dad thought about it for a minute and then nodded and said, "Yeah, I guess so." My mother said, "two and a half."


meara - Sep 16, 2012 11:54:41 am PDT #22295 of 30001

I go back to wondering what a second world country is. These days.


askye - Sep 16, 2012 11:56:00 am PDT #22296 of 30001
Thrive to spite them

Tom - I'm not sure. I think it's still far away like 2017. However, the health care exchange is supposed to kick in by 2014. I don't know if that's just part of the AHCA.

I know there is opposition to it but I don't think the opposition is going to be able to stop it. The biggest arguments against have been - it will cost small business too much money and people will move to VT just for health care and overload the system.

There maybe a few people who live in a bordering state that might make the move but I doubt there's going there's going to be a huge influx of people. The living expenses are high (especially housing), it's really rural and jobs are hard to find, even though the unemployment rate is lower than the national average.