Natter 68: Bork Bork Bork
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
The neighbors just had me over to look at the paint colors for their living room and dining room, and I've now had two cold beers in very quick succession. While breathing paint fumes.
Re: the earlier porn discussion, I think recs like the Porn for Straight Girls ones are well-intentioned but ultimately not that helpful, because sexual turn-ons are so individual. If you take two straight women, the greatest common denominator in what turns them on is presumably someone with a penis, but that leaves a hell of a lot of variation in what kind of someone with a penis. Nothing they've recommended has been even close to something I'd like.
I'm also unsurprised, although skeeved, by the interracial cuckolding thing. I think that's a pretty standard theme in stuff like Penthouse Letters, too.
OK, I have thought this out a little more -- I'm afraid interracial porn, like anything else, follows the "90% is crap" rule, and in that case, most of the crap is totally skeevy. But it's not everything.
I'm always a little skeeved by situations where stuff seems to be acted out to fulfill the non-participating partner's fantasies. Which may be hypocritical since I have no such problem with the voyeuristic nature of porn. But at least with that the viewer's not generally saying "hey, gangbang my wife while I take pictures!"
I don't know. It's sounding a bit like "Everybody's else's porn is skeevy and weird, but my freaky deeky thing that
I
like is untainted. And anybody that thinks my thing is weird makes me angry with their wrongness."
grilled cheese and tomato soup
Oh yes. You just made my dinner decision. Comfort food FTW!
I'm working on my NBCT renewal portfolio. It's slow going. I enjoy writing about teaching and learning and had done a lot of thinking about
what
I was going to write, but I probably should have thought about starting the
actual writing
before now. It's due a week from today. Um. Oops.
Eh. I reserve the right to think stuff is creepy. Doesn't mean I'll try to prevent people who are into it from enjoying themselves; I just won't be attending the key party.
For me, I think most of porn is skeevy and weird in some way, but that doesn't mean all of it is, or that a lot of it's not hot to look at.
stuff seems to be acted out to fulfill the non-participating partner's fantasies
That's really not the dynamic I've encountered in the interracial cuckolding. The husbands seem to be fairly often in chastity belts undergoing orgasm denial, and they do participate, in order to clean up after where the black guy just went.
It's sounding a bit like "Everybody's else's porn is skeevy and weird, but my freaky deeky thing that I like is untainted. And anybody that thinks my thing is weird makes me angry with their wrongness."
Where are you getting that? Half your point is defensiveness, which I haven't seen here.
As for judgy, I am judgy about the racism I think is inherent in the interracial cuckolding kink, and I'm totally good with that. Judgy judgy judge.
I was going to do an hour or two of weeding, but I washed, folded and put away all the laundry, went to the office and worked two hours clearing out recyclables and shredding DVDs, went to the paint store and got touch-up paint for the living room wall and took the dogs on a two mile walk. So now I want to lounge around and, dammit, I will.
That Mandingo stuff is skeevy, I think. Not the humiliation kink, but the fact that for these guys the ultimate humiliation is having specifically a black guy fuck your wife.
I'm sure a lot of people think porn I might like is skeevy. Good for them. I'm perfectly entitled to think porn they like is gross or skeevy or just plain weird, too. But I won't tell them they can't watch it, and I assume they'll do the same for me.