Sarah Silverman Totally Made Out with a Unicorn (The One)
Done in the style of an '80s heavy metal ballad video....
'War Stories'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
Sarah Silverman Totally Made Out with a Unicorn (The One)
Done in the style of an '80s heavy metal ballad video....
I am trying to do my taxes.
Dita is trying to eat my W-2.
I am rewatching S1 of Community and then going back and watching the commentary. I should be out buying fizz or tidying before the cable guy gets here. My living room is a wreck.
I'm so sorry to come back to Natter and find that Sass is still lost. Crossing my fingers as hard as I can!
Vanilla privilege. Part of it I get, part of it is judgy and assumptive itself.
Oh, lord. I understand, really I do. People want to get their freak on and not have it be problematic. But seriously? This is a world where a woman who has "vanilla" missionary-position, woman-on-the-bottom sex with the lights off will still be slut-shamed. So I'm not really on the "no one understands the perverts' pain!" bandwagon. It's just...there doesn't seem to be anything simple about sexuality.
■Vanilla is not used as a pejorative.
This half way down the list made me laugh out loud.
Right? I kind of want to e-mail her the definition of "irony."
A vanilla person can assume their sexual partner will have approximately the same sexual desires they will
That's just willful ignorance.
A vanilla person will not have their sexual orientation called into question due to their sexual practices.
I assume she's never, EVER, met a straight man who likes being on the bottom for anal sex.
A vanilla person does not have to worry about outsiders perceiving their relationship as abusive or pathological.
Wait, seriously? Is she being deliberately obtuse, or is she just stupid?
A vanilla person will not fear their sexual practices counting against them in a divorce.
See above, re: slut-shaming and re: deliberately obtuse/stupid.
I assume she's never, EVER, met a straight man who likes being on the bottom for anal sex.
I'm sure she doesn't count straight men and anal sex as vanilla, especially if he's on the receiving end.
eta: I read more of her tumblr, and she seems to be a smug lesbian submissive who's a professional top, so I figure she figure she's untouchable when she talks about sex.
The question is how do you define vanilla? Is this some 1950s idea of under-the-covers, nightgown-pulled-up, lights-off missionary (and of course heterosexual) sex only? Where does the line get drawn?
...I couldn't get past Peacock Angel. Really?
I'm sure she doesn't count straight men and anal sex as vanilla, especially if he's on the receiving end.
The question is how do you define vanilla? Is this some 1950s idea of under-the-covers, nightgown-pulled-up, lights-off missionary (and of course heterosexual) sex only? Where does the line get drawn?
I think she must be defining it *very* narrowly.
I think she must be defining it *very* narrowly.
I'm sure it's sex where nothing cool happens.