I couldn't believe it the first twenty times you told us, but it's starting to sink in now.

Riley ,'Lessons'


Natter 68: Bork Bork Bork  

Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.


Jesse - Jun 01, 2011 11:24:51 am PDT #10681 of 30001
Sometimes I trip on how happy we could be.

There are people I know who would laugh at that label being applied to me. But I am a damn grown-up, and the whole notion of privileged hipsters telling people that being responsible means you aren't giving your all to your ART makes me want to take a mallet to them.

Oh good LORD. People are ridiculous, and would probably benefit from having a mallet taken to them. Because then they'd need to get a day job to pay the hospital bills.


§ ita § - Jun 01, 2011 11:28:04 am PDT #10682 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Where I'm getting hung up is the lack of sexual attraction even after getting to know the person

I'm not sure where you're getting that from. What I understand of demisexuality, you're entirely dependent on emotional attraction for physical arousal. For "conventional" sexuality, it's one component, and not required.

Wow. Peppers and OJ. My stomach hates me right now. And I hate aging.


Atropa - Jun 01, 2011 11:30:11 am PDT #10683 of 30001
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.

I have friends who support themselves through busking and hustling for every gig they can get, and I admire that. But they also live in fear of surprise bills or sudden health emergencies.


Steph L. - Jun 01, 2011 11:38:32 am PDT #10684 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

As this is a fairly new topic to me, I'm trying to understand and ask this in all sincerity, no snarkiness implied whatsoever. How is this different from sexual attraction? I understand the personality is the source of your desire for Tim, but, if I'm reading this correctly, you *have* a sexual attraction to Tim.

I understand, no snarkiness inferred!

(This may answer Typo's question about a good source, BTW.) AVEN [link] describes demisexuality as not having "primary sexual attraction" for someone, but having "secondary sexual attraction" for that person after forming an emotional connection. IOW, pretty much exactly ita's example of her being able to be sexually attracted to a guy without knowing anything about his personality at all, but I can't.

Which doesn't answer your question about -- is what I have towards Tim *sexual* attraction. I guess it is. I just hesitate to call it that because, again, (1) I really, truly, don't actually know what qualifies as "sexual attraction" (so maybe what I feel doesn't qualify) and (2) as an identity, this is still really new to me, so I'm still working it out.

And, doesn't personality affect sexual attraction for most people? I can find a guy sexually attractive, get to know him, and get turned right off because his personality is repellant. Or vice versa.

I think the key here is where you said "I can find a guy sexually attractive, get to know him, and get turned right off because his personality is repellant." -- the first part of the sentence, where you do find him sexually attractive *first* -- that actually happens for you. It's real. Even if it's mitigated for you once he opens his mouth and starts talking about how awesome Carrot Top is, you still felt sexual attraction *first* that then went down the tubes.

I think that's normal for sexual people. But for sexual people, it can work in either direction: (1) sexual attraction first, personality second > bad personality > sexual attraction gone; (2) personality first > compelling personality > sexual attraction, hello!

But for demisexual people it only works in one direction, which is: personality first, sexual attraction second. Does that make sense?


beth b - Jun 01, 2011 11:42:21 am PDT #10685 of 30001
oh joy! Oh Rapture ! I have a brain!

Chikat - I can't speak for Steph, but I can give some of why what she says make sense to me. the whole 3 date rule - doesn't work for me. I don't know enough about someone to have sex with them. the idea of sex because so and so is hot- not there. I don't like cake more than sex ( which seems to be the asexual metaphor ). As some one in a long term relationship - 20ish years. Sex is better when we are more emotionally connected and the longer we have had this connection.


Steph L. - Jun 01, 2011 11:42:39 am PDT #10686 of 30001
this mess was yours / now your mess is mine

Where I'm getting hung up is the lack of sexual attraction even after getting to know the person

I'm not sure where you're getting that from.

I think from me, since I said I wasn't sure if I'd call it sexual attraction to Tim. But my hesitation is just because I'm not sure what I feel matches up with what the vast majority knows as "sexual attraction" and takes as a given.

But (hello to the oversharing) -- yeah, I want to have sex with him, however you put the emphasis in that sentence. I want to have sex WITH him. I WANT to have sex with him. I want to have sex with HIM.

Which I guess is sexual attraction. Or Timsexual attraction.


Atropa - Jun 01, 2011 11:42:59 am PDT #10687 of 30001
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.

Other things I have learned from Twitter: there is someone with the user ID spiderinurhouse, and they gleefully write taunting replies to tweets about, oh, giant spiders in people's houses. Some people have some strange hobbies, I tell you what.


Toddson - Jun 01, 2011 11:44:00 am PDT #10688 of 30001
Friends don't let friends read "Atlas Shrugged"

Is this the person who, um, gifted the world with The Pop-Up Book of Phobias?


Atropa - Jun 01, 2011 11:47:46 am PDT #10689 of 30001
The artist formerly associated with cupcakes.

I have no idea, but it should be. And yes, that is a pop-up book I have NEVER paged through.


§ ita § - Jun 01, 2011 11:58:51 am PDT #10690 of 30001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

My sister just got comped mad shit on her way to South Africa because she bumped up against visa troubles. She got some really nice people at the flight desk there. I can't believe they're making her pay for a Swiss visa to just pass through the country.