Xander ,'Touched'
Off-topic discussion. Wanna talk about corsets, pandas, duct tape, or physics? This is the place. Detailed discussion of any current-season TV must be whitefonted.
"I do not subscribe to this, but I know that some feel that … if a baby cannot make it through birth, it is not favored evolutionarily."
I want to punch her in the face.
You should, and if she can't run fast enough from all the fists flying at her face, it's because she wasn't favoured evolutionarily.
Wasn't the world awesome before modern medicine??
I want my flying car and small pox scars!
Those people? Are jerks. And they are becoming more and more numerous everyday within the culture of motherhood.
Or on the internets. I love the e-world, but its a highly effective megaphone for bullshit.
"I do not subscribe to this, but I know that some feel that … if a baby cannot make it through birth, it is not favored evolutionarily."
OK, she did say she didn't subscribe to this.
I mean, if she's lying, sure, go ahead and slug her. But don't just brain the messenger because you don't like the message.
The fact that she brings it up, though, means she thinks there's merit. There is NO other reason for her to even mention it, the sanctimonious wrong-headed, insensitive bitch. (In the context of her conversation with the mother.)
OK, she did say she didn't subscribe to this.
I had this reaction, too. Like, maybe she's horrifically tactless and monumentally stupid.
But obviously not everyone read it the same way.
I'm not defending her; regardless of whether she's being stupid and tactless or being sanctimonious, that's not something you say to an expectant mother who had a traumatic first birth.
I got that Bialik said she didn't subscribe to it -- I was reacting to whoever out there *does*, whom I didn't know existed until I read her quote.
The fact that she brings it up, though, means she thinks there's merit. There is NO other reason for her to even mention it, the sanctimonious wrong-headed, insensitive bitch. (In the context of her conversation with the mother.)
No it doesn't. The fact that she brings it up means that someone called and asked her about home birth stuff for an article. We don't even know who brought it up, really. It could have been the questioner.
Should she have pretended, upon being asked, that she'd simply never heard the question addressed?
I was reacting to that and to her snide remark about, "I felt like a failure ... But it's not like I had a C-section."