OMG, SOCKS!!
Jon Stewart CLEARLY is at fault.
'Sleeper'
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risqué (and frisqué), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
OMG, SOCKS!!
Jon Stewart CLEARLY is at fault.
I bet I could wear 'em with chunky cocks.
BEST TYPO EVER.
And I'll need about an hour -- I left them at home so I'll have to run down there to check (pretty sure Hec is out and about selling things and Emmett is home but doped and flu-y).
But there's a double-standard there, isn't there? Saying "Prayer is magical thinking" is interpreted as disrespect towards religion, but saying "Prayer is real" is accepted as a neutral statement of religious belief.
I definitely see your point, maybe intent is the key here. A atheist who says "prayer is magical thinking" knows and either intends to or doesn't care about offending the believer, while saying "prayer is real" is not intended to offend.
(and FTR, I am engaging in an intellectual exercise here. I absolutely respect everyone's belief or lack thereof. I suppose that technically, I'm Christian, so am biased in that direction, but am trying to be neutral :) )
I definitely see your point, maybe intent is the key here. A atheist who says "prayer is magical thinking" knows and either intends to or doesn't care about offending the believer, while saying "prayer is real" is not intended to offend.
Saying prayer is real can only be read as not intended to offend if you assume religion as the default state of humanity. It's a function of religious privilege in that respect.
nothin' to see, move along.
I don't know... I think it sounds like magic when you are talking to someone who feels they need to ask God whether to turn left or right or something. But that may not be because I'm a religious skeptic...that might be a very Lutheran thought, or at least via Lake Wobegon it is.(all of GK's Lutheran jokes seem about spot-on from here.) But I wouldn't say that asking God for help with something is like waiting for the tooth fairy or something...heck, I ask myself. You never know. I might hug it out with the divine eventually...the Eastern stuff helps some, but I'd feel like a poser trying to convert(I admire George Harrison very much for that. Also for not deciding in the mid-seventies that India was so last year.)
Dinna fash yerself, JZ.
No hurry. I don't have Paypal, but I can offer $30 for 'em and shipping. You get better than that, you take it, and give Deb my love and good wishes.
A atheist who says "prayer is magical thinking" knows and either intends to or doesn't care about offending the believer, while saying "prayer is real" is not intended to offend.
I really don't think I could disagree more. The assumption (from one side only, I might add) that the intent of the other is to offend is exactly where the double standard comes in. One side is expected to walk on eggshells and the other side is not.
Saying prayer is real can only be read as not intended to offend if you assume religion as the default state of humanity. It's a function of religious privilege in that respect.
This.
But also, someone who says something like "prayer is real" is usually talking about their own prayer, while someone who says "prayer is magical thinking" is usually talking about someone else's prayer. It's analyzing not just what the person is doing, but what the person is thinking. Saying "Someone who believes that God will immediately respond to each prayer and grant the petitioner's request is engaging in magical thinking" is different than saying "Someone who prays is engaging in magical thinking."