-t in Natter:
Sadness is good at sneak attacks.
This thread is for Buffista quotage. Posts that are profound, witty, or otherwise deserving of immortality go here. This is also Shrift's source for the BRQG, so be aware that if your words end up here, they'll also end up there. Finally, please note which thread spawned the quotage and please white-out anything that might be spoilery to Un-Americans.
-t in Natter:
Sadness is good at sneak attacks.
Context What Context
Jesse: (Needless to say, I know that elf from band.)
From Natter.
Gudanov: I know Trump doesn't list it among his accomplishments, but somehow he's made Nancy Pelosi cool.
Jessica, in Natter (context be damned):
You TAKE the hamberders. You LEAVE the newspaper!
Gudanov, in Natter: (made me snort, fortunately with no snot)
Sorry about all the snot and rage. I'd say take some deep breaths, but, you know, snot.
Marvelverse:
Steph L. : Y'ALL. Those white suits are for them to go into the Quantum Realm, aren't they?
Billytea: Either that or they're preparing to travel back in time... to before Labor Day.
From the wilds of Natter:
shrift: In other news, I think I've discovered the person who's been using my email address as her own, and it's an Australian MP. Is it more or less weird to stalk someone online who's a public figure and yell at them to stop using your email address?
Dana: Well, first question. Can you, using this address, actually govern Australia?
It's funny because we know these are beloved cats.(Giving the stinkeye to interwebs spies.)
Steph: Murderbiscuit will try to carry on Squeaky Fromme's legacy.
billytea in Marvel Universe:
Let the record show that Tom's steel bladder needed just a little more Venom.
(Context: Natter)
Steph: Here's an accusation about my editing from an author that I haven't heard before: it's a tiny (2-page) commentary on a big research article, and the author is part of the Department of Defense (the big research article used active military members for their study, so the DoD is involved).
The author of the article said that I made "an unprecedented amount" of changes to her commentary, and it would require a week of new review by the DoD because -- I swear she said this -- "the changes could be damaging to the Department of Defense."
GUYS. YOU GUYS. I think I know how to take down the Trump administration. I'll sneak in through the DoD with my wily editing skillz! (Seriously. My editing to her tiny commentary could be *damaging* to the DoD??? If that's true, our country's military is is grave danger.)
Jessica: Wait Teppy are you saying the key to undoing the damage caused by the 2016 election is...correct punctuation and properly formatted citations? HOLY SHIT BUFFISTAS THIS IS WHAT WE'VE BEEN TRAINING FOR
Steph: I am dizzy with the power. DIZZY AND READY TO UNLEASH SEMICOLONS UPON THE WHITE HOUSE
Toddson: Are we weaponizing the gerunds?