Maybe so, and that's problematic, however from the actor's POV it's better to be able to play Worf and that character's story.
Better to be able to play Worf than Picard? Or Crusher? Why?
It's possible that he's in the land of perpetual Wednesday, or the crazy melty land, or you know, the world without shrimp.
Anya ,'Showtime'
Buffista Movies 7: Brides for 7 Samurai
A place to talk about movies--old and new, good and bad, high art and high cheese. It's the place to place your kittens on the award winners, gossip about upcoming fims and discuss DVD releases and extras. Spoiler policy: White font all plot-related discussion until a movie's been in wide release two weeks, and keep the major HSQ in white font until two weeks after the video/DVD release.
§ ita § - Apr 13, 2010 9:19:51 am PDT #7587 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Jessica - Apr 13, 2010 9:29:09 am PDT #7588 of 30000
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
That's not to say that sometimes there aren't nefarious things going on, but couldn't there also NOT be?
I wouldn't necessarily say "nefarious" but my understanding is that there is almost ALWAYS a "we need a minority - which characters can we make the black guy?" meeting.
quester - Apr 13, 2010 9:29:15 am PDT #7589 of 30000
Danger is my middle name, only I spell it R. u. t. h. - Tina Belcher.
Better to be able to play Worf than Picard? Or Crusher? Why?
Because Picard and Crusher were boring and Worf had a far richer character history?
§ ita § - Apr 13, 2010 9:33:36 am PDT #7590 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Because Picard and Crusher were boring and Worf had a far richer character history?
Worf had one, very guttural, note. Crusher, yeah, boring, but I don't think she was more boring than Worf, save he got fight scenes.
Picard, OTOH, got screen time. He got to count lights, and play the flute. Data got to explore the nature of humanity. I hated Data, but he definitely had "stuff" to work with. Worf, not much of a challenge.
P.M. Marc - Apr 13, 2010 9:41:17 am PDT #7591 of 30000
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear
ITA ita.
Dana - Apr 13, 2010 9:43:05 am PDT #7592 of 30000
I haven't trusted science since I saw the film "Flubber."
Same with Teal'c, on SG-1.
Glamcookie - Apr 13, 2010 9:52:29 am PDT #7593 of 30000
I know my own heart and understand my fellow man. But I am made unlike anyone I have ever met. I dare to say I am like no one in the whole world. - Anne Lister
Aw, I loved Worf! Then again, I also loved Crusher. And since ita brought it up:
THERE ARE 4 LIGHTS!!!!
§ ita § - Apr 13, 2010 9:54:23 am PDT #7594 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Same with Teal'c, on SG-1.
And Ronon on SGA. And pretty much Teyla. Not that SGA gave anyone anything to do not named McKay. And that wasn't a proper character.
THERE ARE 4 LIGHTS!!!!
That is a fuck-yeah moment.
DavidS - Apr 13, 2010 9:55:31 am PDT #7595 of 30000
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."
Better to play Worf than a drug dealer. (Unless he's on The Wire.)
DS9 did manage to give us a black lead in the Star Trek franchise.
§ ita § - Apr 13, 2010 9:59:31 am PDT #7596 of 30000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
DS9 did manage to give us a black lead in the Star Trek franchise.
That was a good role. Worf was just another angry black Klingon, like most of them were in the new incarnation. I don't see anything special or challenging about him.
Better than a drug dealer doesn't mean good. There are still other stereotypes.