Anya: It's lovely! I wish it was mine! Oh like you weren't all thinking the same thing. Giles: I'm fairly certain I wasn't.

'The Killer In Me'


Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?  

[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.


Theresa - Apr 16, 2010 11:25:01 am PDT #7529 of 30002
"What would it take to get your daughter to stop tweeting about this?"

Woot! Amy FTW!


§ ita § - Apr 16, 2010 11:25:23 am PDT #7530 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

The look was totally to let Sam know what Dean was thinking.

I disagree. I think Dean was looking at Sam because he was thinking about Sam. At least the long bit, before the transition. Then it all sank in, the trust, the everything, and then he was communicating with him and the coolth began.

As for erotically co-dependent, I think they're both entirely able to get their rocks off apart from each other. It's probably one of the few satisfactions where I don't think they're textually caught up in each other.

Now, sure they may not be able to fall in love properly because of each other (and because where do you find a woman who'll deal with that shit?), but that's not the same thing. And I'm willing to argue either side about that.

However, nifty thing to tell a new brother...

I brought up Supernatural's view of hell briefly in a meeting today, and managed to get two laughs. I mean really...I just said "better that view of hell than Supernatural's." Why did they laugh? They're weird.


§ ita § - Apr 16, 2010 11:26:11 am PDT #7531 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

honey smacks:

That's from the episode with the fan con and Chuck giving the panel.

Thank you! I totally couldn't place it. I love that clip. I think I have the animated gif sitting around somewhere.


Amy - Apr 16, 2010 11:27:39 am PDT #7532 of 30002
Because books.

That was one of my favorite bits from that episode, Theresa.

I disagree. I think Dean was looking at Sam because he was thinking about Sam. At least the long bit, before the transition. Then it all sank in, the trust, the everything, and then he was communicating with him and the coolth began.

Exactly. And the way his face changed so slowly as he realized what he was going to do, and then the tiny hint of a smile, and the WINK! The wink sent me, man. So Dean.


§ ita § - Apr 16, 2010 11:34:14 am PDT #7533 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

We got two Dean winks last night. It was quite the festival. I was so agog at the line he threw to Cas about the eyesexing that I had to rewind, and I'm glad I did, because I missed that wink the first time round.

He was very sassy last night.

I did read in someone's LJ a comparison of both winks and how it was clear that one wink was sexual and the other was "you'll never tap this" but I do think that's going more than a little far with the source material.


Theresa - Apr 16, 2010 11:34:44 am PDT #7534 of 30002
"What would it take to get your daughter to stop tweeting about this?"

Well, yeah, you guys said it better. I was just arguing that the look wasn't Wincest.


§ ita § - Apr 16, 2010 11:36:43 am PDT #7535 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I'm still wondering about who the letter was to. The box had to go to Bobby because Bobby actually has an address. But the car? The coat? Bobby? Nah.


Amy - Apr 16, 2010 11:39:05 am PDT #7536 of 30002
Because books.

I hope the contents of the letter makes it to the DVDs as a special feature or something. They did a script once, so.

I actually the missed the wink at Castiel. I think I was so astounded I couldn't see straight for a minute.

Which brings me to the fact that I give in. I waited all day, I've worked, I've written, I've parented, now I'm rewatching. Before I explode.


Theresa - Apr 16, 2010 11:40:19 am PDT #7537 of 30002
"What would it take to get your daughter to stop tweeting about this?"

I did read in someone's LJ a comparison of both winks and how it was clear that one wink was sexual and the other was "you'll never tap this" but I do think that's going more than a little far with the source material.

Were they saying the wink to Sam was sexual, 'cause no. I didn't get that in any way.

If the wink to Cas was "you'll never tap this" it was the same as guys provoking each other and totally locker room teasing. It was just a provoking wink.

I'll argue that the subtext for both slashes are there all day, but I haven't seen anything that makes either text or any characters aware of the subtext.

I'm still wondering about who the letter was to. The box had to go to Bobby because Bobby actually has an address. But the car? The coat? Bobby? Nah.

He put the letter in the box. eta: OHHH! Do you mean he had it addressed to someone else (like Ben) to be delivered at a later time by Bobby! Cause that would be awesome!!


§ ita § - Apr 16, 2010 11:44:00 am PDT #7538 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Were they saying the wink to Sam was sexual, 'cause no. I didn't get that in any way.

Yeah, they were. I can fill in between the lines in general, but to sex up that wink--that's doing serious wish-fulfillment work.

Filling inbetween the lines of Dean and Castiel, on the other hand, was made really damned easy. And sad. That fight in the alley--well, no, the beatdown, was such a heavy betrayal.

He put the letter in the box.

Yes, because it's all got to go somewhere. But to who? Is it going to Bobby, or Sam @ Bobby's house?