Also, as usual, I'm dying to see what the new opening credits will be, based on this season's theme. I can't come up with anything!
Never mind! I think I just saw it in the promo.
That's beautiful. Or taken literally, incredibly gross.
Buffy ,'Potential'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
Amy - Sep 18, 2013 4:57:40 pm PDT #28928 of 30002
Because books.
Amy - Sep 18, 2013 5:31:41 pm PDT #28929 of 30002
Because books.
§ ita § - Sep 18, 2013 6:44:15 pm PDT #28930 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
PIG IN A FUCKING POKE.
Sorry, it's weird to say they didn't die on a Tuesday. By that rubric, neither Saturday not Sunday...
Sorry, am I nitpicking an extra minute of J2/boys? Seems I am. Must be a fan, then.
§ ita § - Sep 20, 2013 6:05:34 pm PDT #28931 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
the0voice0from0above is back on AO3! And reposting. Not everything yet, but some old stuff, and I am reading everything right now.
You might not care, but you should! Improbable AU scenarios for the win! She's no Jollysnidge, but she's still damned engrossing.
Morgana - Sep 20, 2013 9:12:47 pm PDT #28932 of 30002
"I make mistakes, but I am on the side of Good," the Golux said, "by accident and happenchance.” – The 13 Clocks, James Thurber
Have you guys seen this yet? An Impala papercraft pattern that is simply lovely to behold (click on the LJ link to be taken to her journal and all the photo closeups): [link]
Amy - Sep 21, 2013 6:26:07 am PDT #28933 of 30002
Because books.
ita, I think the "not dying on Tuesday" thing was a joke.
Morgana, I did see that! It's very tempting.
§ ita § - Sep 21, 2013 6:35:21 am PDT #28934 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
But it was weak because there isn't much contrast. "Neither of us" would have made a better reversal, for instance. And a clearer allusion to the episode and modulation of delivery.
I know what the goal of the day-metioning was, but I don't think it was successful with everything it raised.
§ ita § - Sep 21, 2013 6:00:30 pm PDT #28935 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Anyone in fandom who just got a cowboy fetish is pretty particular.
But I realise I'm tired when I have to put off reacting to Misha's photos until another time.
Shit. Reaction queue got longer: [link]
![[link]](http://www.spoilertv.co.uk/images/supernatural/Season%209/Cast%20Promotional%20Photos/001.JPEG.php){kind=link}
§ ita § - Sep 21, 2013 8:05:37 pm PDT #28936 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Did I miss something new:
ALL OF US QUEER FANS WHO SPN CRAPS ON. Why are Adam Glass’s hurt feelings more valid than our hurt feelings about being portrayed as jokes, predators, and token side characters like Charlie, Barnes, and Damien in a show whose creators and fans like to tout as being so queer positive?
§ ita § - Sep 22, 2013 4:41:52 am PDT #28937 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Sans shame:
I finally left a comment to the effect of:
liked the D/C relationship, not a fan of AU Dean hating John so much more than canon, skimmed that bit, Jess is not petite.
Not that author's fault she caught me on night 3 of epic insomnia, but it's comment 364. I'm sure she'll get over it.