I kind of love Garth's complete and utter lack of manpain. I find it hilarious.
'War Stories'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
I kind of love Garth's complete and utter lack of manpain. I find it hilarious.
Yeah, that bit was fabulous.
Here's the Canadian promo for next week. You'd think it's an entirely different episode, but those are precisely the things mentioned in the listing on my TiVo: [link]
Like the point about the Winchesters not owning Bobby.
Which is so true. I mean, I know the show is Winchesters so we're focused on them but I was charmed and relieved to see that someone was taking what they'd learned from Bobby and moving forward trying to help more hunters and more people. Garth deserves to wear that hat.
I kind of love Garth's complete and utter lack of manpain. I find it hilarious.
Yep.
Enjoyable ep, overall. I guess it's pretty clear we're going to see Benny again. I'm so OK with that.
Me too. It reminds me that the Show remembers how to have characters interact and trust each other and fight gorgeously. And I like Benny. He's not killing people and was even trying to right some wrongs.
Amelia certainly seemed more like a real character finally. Why are they using that weird filming technique though. I swear it makes me wonder if she's real but when Sam leaves in the first ep, she's not filmed odd.
I wonder if Benny will turn out to have been lying about having stopped killing. I don't think they have foreshadowed that, but at this point I don't trust the writers not to pull character retcons out of their ass.
Shouldn't they, like, burn the hat?
It reminds me that the Show remembers how to have characters interact and trust each other and fight gorgeously. And I like Benny. He's not killing people and was even trying to right some wrongs.
A world of yes.
Shouldn't they, like, burn the hat?
Very good point...
Shouldn't they, like, burn the hat?
Is it still considered a personal item if you left it somewhere before you died? Because if so, yeah. But if anything a person ever owned could keep them around as a ghost there needs to be a lot of property going up in flames every time someone dies.
Also a good point. I'd say if you give something to someone, it becomes theirs, so yeah. I wonder whether all their ghost killing tracks that way. Not enough to do the research, because lazy.
But if anything a person ever owned could keep them around as a ghost there needs to be a lot of property going up in flames every time someone dies.
t lurking, because I'm over a season behind
Most ghost-lore is centered around it being an item that was important to the ghost. Which means that for future reference, if I don't become an immortal vampire witch queen, my top hat and Clovis are going to be the haunted items.