So maybe he would get hungry.
But I don't want Dean to eat Cas!!
It's possible that he's in the land of perpetual Wednesday, or the crazy melty land, or you know, the world without shrimp.
Anya ,'Showtime'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
Juliebird - Jul 28, 2012 2:47:59 pm PDT #26019 of 30002
I am the fly who dreams of the spider
Amy - Jul 28, 2012 2:48:59 pm PDT #26020 of 30002
Because books.
I highly doubt that's what would happen.
§ ita § - Jul 28, 2012 2:51:04 pm PDT #26021 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I don't get why your minds are not in the gutter. What's (not) wrong with you?
Amy - Jul 28, 2012 3:14:46 pm PDT #26022 of 30002
Because books.
There are better words for that than eating?
I'm all for them seeking shelter in each other's arms. And, you know, other body parts.
§ ita § - Jul 28, 2012 3:24:46 pm PDT #26023 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Unless you do mean he is eating him (out).
Matt the Bruins fan - Jul 28, 2012 3:27:36 pm PDT #26024 of 30002
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
I initially thought the angel swords were just manifestations of the angels' will/aggression/power (hence why angels could only be killed by other angels). But they seemed to abandon that to let Dean use one to kill Zachariah, and Meg has used them since while referring to there being lots of dead angels to loot.
Amy - Jul 28, 2012 3:32:08 pm PDT #26025 of 30002
Because books.
That still annoys me. In the beginning of S4, when Castiel is talking to Dean in Bobby's kitchen (in his dream), he says that several of his fellow angels had been killed in battle. So a) he knew angels could die, and b) if they were killed in battle, wouldn't he know *how* they were killed? The whole "we don't know how angels are being murdered" was so clumsy.
Juliebird - Jul 28, 2012 3:42:51 pm PDT #26026 of 30002
I am the fly who dreams of the spider
I thought that last part was referring to angels being picked off individually while not having been in battle at time preceding their death. That this was Uriel killing those who refused to join him during a private chitchat.
But yeah, the whole angels-dying thing did not mesh with the statement that only angels can kill other angels, so unless Cas and his garrison and the other Heavenly folks were battling a whole bunch of "fallen" angels openly on the side of Lucifer . . . ugh.
§ ita § - Jul 28, 2012 4:17:13 pm PDT #26027 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I don't think there was any evidence that angel swords were just manifestations--didn't we see more than one of them together (or in the hand of someone other than an angel) even before Dean took one and stabbed Zachariah?
I don't think there was ever any confusion about whether or not angels could die, but the fact that they'd ever stated only angels could kill each other was clearly at odds with the idea that anyone other than Uriel was killing them, which was an issue.
Amy - Jul 28, 2012 4:34:08 pm PDT #26028 of 30002
Because books.
That's what I meant, but probably didn't articulate clearly -- Cas mentions right off in the second episode that angels have died (and I presumed in battle, because he was talking about battle at the time), but when angels are showing up dead later, they're all, "How?! What can kill an angel?" Which makes no sense.