The King of Cups expects a picnic. But this is not his birthday!

Drusilla ,'Conversations with Dead People'


Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?  

[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.


§ ita § - Jul 28, 2012 4:17:13 pm PDT #26027 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I don't think there was any evidence that angel swords were just manifestations--didn't we see more than one of them together (or in the hand of someone other than an angel) even before Dean took one and stabbed Zachariah?

I don't think there was ever any confusion about whether or not angels could die, but the fact that they'd ever stated only angels could kill each other was clearly at odds with the idea that anyone other than Uriel was killing them, which was an issue.


Amy - Jul 28, 2012 4:34:08 pm PDT #26028 of 30002
Because books.

That's what I meant, but probably didn't articulate clearly -- Cas mentions right off in the second episode that angels have died (and I presumed in battle, because he was talking about battle at the time), but when angels are showing up dead later, they're all, "How?! What can kill an angel?" Which makes no sense.


§ ita § - Jul 29, 2012 6:39:22 pm PDT #26029 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Look! Is baby: [link] ! And some adults, but who cares, in comparison?


§ ita § - Jul 30, 2012 4:59:50 am PDT #26030 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

As someone on Tumblr pointed out: the difference between Misha and Jared.


Amy - Jul 30, 2012 6:11:52 am PDT #26031 of 30002
Because books.

Wow, so true. And it's not just the outfits -- West looks skeptical and cynical, and Thomas is like, "Hi! HI, PEOPLE! I LOVE YOU! YAY!"


Amy - Jul 30, 2012 6:11:53 am PDT #26032 of 30002
Because books.

Whoa, double posting. Stop that.


§ ita § - Jul 31, 2012 2:49:28 pm PDT #26033 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Okay, I'm having a million confusions. I saw this movie poster on Tumblr, but not only does it look ridiculous, it has lots of familiar names, but no entry in IMDB. When I look up Lee Ehlers (I swear that name is familiar, but only 2 credits? Okay...), he has a Matt Cohen title to his name, but not this one. But one with this guy, who looks familiar, but I don't recognise any of his credits. And he doesn't seem to have a twin brother.

He does remind me of the demon who told Dean he doesn't speak "little bitch". Anyone remember who played him?

But the names of the actors aren't even spelt right, so I shouldn't worry about it.

And, man, Katie Cassidy looks both older and more sultry as a brunette. I didn't recognise her at first.


Amy - Aug 01, 2012 8:01:58 am PDT #26034 of 30002
Because books.

I'd be surprised if they were the leads in a movie, unless it was very very indie, but the poster is pretty funny.

I liked Katie Cassidy better as a brunette in Harper's Island. I think she's naturally brunette, too.


§ ita § - Aug 01, 2012 8:34:23 am PDT #26035 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Hmm. It's not the same demon.

I remember very little about Harper's Island that wasn't Vic Webster or Jim Beaver. But I agree that Katie looks better with darker hair. Her and Emma Stone should come over to the dark side and stay.

It's weird--whenever I see bits of S6 with Robo!Sam, I feel bad that Sam missed those experiences. And that Dean never got to share those moments with his real brother. Especially Two and a Half Men. Real Sam and a baby, dammit!


Amy - Aug 01, 2012 4:37:16 pm PDT #26036 of 30002
Because books.

Real!Sam and a baby would be awesome.

Completely unrelated, but in "The Slice Girls," a) Harry Groener! and b) it feels like a "Hush" callback when he's explaining the symbol in the victims' chests to them in the lecture room at the college. I'm sure it's not, but still.

I know this is Dawson's Creek era, but I'm oddly okay with this look. More than okay.

And last, Jensen in flip-flops! And Danneel is some very funky pants. (Beware the sound on that page, though -- I couldn't figure out to turn it off.)