I don't think that the statistics support making an assumption. The worse the assumption is, the more evidence you have to bring forth.

I just followed a link on io9 to a hotel in Boston that's a renovation of the old Charles Street Prison, and was sitting here thinking how they'd never done a prison episode until it hit me ... Folsom Prison Blues, duh. Someone come take my temperature.

I hate that assumption, although it's certainly not always wrong.

It's increasingly correct, but that's more due to the increasing radicalization of the GOP pushing out people who disagree, reducing the former big tent party to an individual camping size tent of one.

Certainly, it depends on a number of factors, including geographic area. The vote on marriage rights in Washington State included support from Christian Republicans, for example. (I may possibly have sent pleading letters to one of them. Maybe.)

And in general, not in specifics, Republican-associated Christians from Texas tend to hold beliefs that I find to be repugnant, which is why I ain't bovvered by the fact that Paul's aunt disowned his (Christian) father and uncle for not being Christian enough, where Christian = Specifically Narrow Definition Held By Some Texas Baptist Churches.

But in terms of one person, living outside the sphere of Texas and not speaking publically about religion or politics, unmanly = homophobe = kind of a big stretch.

What bothers me most is the Christian part of the assumption. I know plenty of Christians who support gay rights.

The Republican party is just ... gross now. But I have no idea how you change it. It's a giant, lumbering, bullying monster.

Is this the article in question, ita? It says Misha wasn't happy with the dialog, either.

I hate people. Nobody can say anything anymore without having it vetted first.

What bothers me most is the Christian part of the assumption. I know plenty of Christians who support gay rights.

Oh, totally. Also, this is reminding me that I miss you. We need to be on the same coast so we can have conversations with booze and hand gestures and shorthand!

Because I can booze and hand gesture this topic, oh yes. Happens most family gatherings, in fact.

I would like to be on that coast very soon, if I can. I would also like some booze, very much.

But not enough for another hangover.

But not enough for another hangover.

Clearly, we must learn to pace ourselves!

Oh, I'm talking about this weekend. The neighbors' party on Sunday night was pretty epic.

I was strangely fine the morning after I saw you nice people! I think it was the chocolate. And the LOVE. ::nods::

I also want that cocktail I had in the bar. The watermelony one? (I think?) Whichever it was, it was delicious.