Buffistas

Gabriel: Are you trying to destroy this family? Simon: I didn't realize it would be so easy.

'Safe'

Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?

[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.

First Previous Next Last Recent

§ ita § - Apr 04, 2012 1:33:29 pm PDT #24822 of 30002

Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I just do not think the Winchesters would be laid-back about leaving Meg with free rein to whisper in Cas's ear whenever she wants if they knew

But they do know. Dean called Meg for an update on Cas's status. This is, I assume, the mutually assured destruction to which Dean referred. They need someone to watch and protect Cas, and she needs them to not kill her.

P.M. Marc - Apr 04, 2012 2:38:39 pm PDT #24823 of 30002

So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

ita !, I'm with you. I thought it was a plan, and read the MAD line the same way.

Re: the Pacer [link]

Party on.

§ ita § - Apr 04, 2012 2:47:01 pm PDT #24824 of 30002

Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Hmmph. That site has a notable omission. Okay, quite a few.

Matt the Bruins fan - Apr 04, 2012 3:00:38 pm PDT #24825 of 30002

"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand

I somehow missed that it was Meg they were calling about Cas last week.

Amy - Apr 04, 2012 3:51:23 pm PDT #24826 of 30002

Because books.

Well, there's some interesting news. Sera, we hardly knew ye.

Amy - Apr 04, 2012 3:53:49 pm PDT #24827 of 30002

Because books.

Awwww! That's lovely of them to thank the fans. Also, go fandom. I love when we do nice things.

§ ita § - Apr 04, 2012 3:58:41 pm PDT #24828 of 30002

Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

That explains my Twitter feed. I really wish people would indicate what they're reacting to, not just post their reactions.

I need to make sure I don't go near the Tumblrs of the people who were asking for her head for running Misha out of town. Too much of a risk they'll be gloating now.

I'm sad to see her go. I like her energy, and I like her episodes.

But, yeah, if she's being replaced, not just stepping down--that's really positive for a new season.

Amy - Apr 04, 2012 4:02:34 pm PDT #24829 of 30002

Because books.

I agree -- I can't imagine why they would have hired a new showrunner, and let it leak, if they weren't fairly certain the series would be renewed.

Sera didn't drive Misha away! Reality, folks! Look into it.

§ ita § - Apr 04, 2012 4:08:18 pm PDT #24830 of 30002

Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Fans? Reality? Methinks you ask too much.

I'm sad to see them down a woman of great influence in the writers room. I hope it's not too much to ask that they acquire some more down the road.

Someone just called 'Mystery Spot' one of the funny episodes. I need to learn how to let that go. They played bits of it as slapstick, and people laughed. But I just found it so overwhelmingly tragic that I get defensive for the boys.

It doesn't help that she's slamming Ben Edlund as being ridiculous at the same time, I suppose.

Amy - Apr 04, 2012 4:15:19 pm PDT #24831 of 30002

Because books.

When I hear "Mystery Spot," I always think of the funny first, just for the visuals. Also, I think, because I was astonished when the episode turned halfway through into the giant angstfest with scary obsessed!Sam.

First Previous Next Last Recent