Don't hit your head!
Plus, I think Jared started it.
Mal: Cut it out. Job's not done until we're back on Serenity. Zoe: Sorry, sir. Didn't mean to enjoy the moment.
'Ariel'
Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
§ ita § - Sep 20, 2011 12:06:49 pm PDT #21426 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Amy - Sep 20, 2011 12:45:15 pm PDT #21427 of 30002
Because books.
§ ita § - Sep 20, 2011 1:05:48 pm PDT #21428 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Oh, I'm immune to those eyes.
It's the hands that are the problem.
Theresa - Sep 20, 2011 1:17:17 pm PDT #21429 of 30002
"What would it take to get your daughter to stop tweeting about this?"
Guh. I wonder if they know their own power.
I also remembered that I wanted to say it was disappointing to learn of CC's personality and problems. Those pics of her on set with the boys were so cute if you could separate any past knowledge.
It also must be a PR thing to refer to the J's as "the boys" because she did so a couple times and other people do, but they aren't really boys anymore. I mean, they will always be "boys" to me because I watched them grow up (kinda), but someone who isn't a fan of the show should think that term weird, right?
§ ita § - Sep 20, 2011 1:23:47 pm PDT #21430 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Theresa--that's guest star spoiler info.
I do think "boys" is weird, but I'm not going to stop. Their characters are "the boys" and so are they. So there.
Theresa - Sep 20, 2011 1:37:36 pm PDT #21431 of 30002
"What would it take to get your daughter to stop tweeting about this?"
Oops. Sorry, I didn't remember where it was being talked about.
Yeah, I can't think of them as anything other than the boys.
§ ita § - Sep 20, 2011 1:48:54 pm PDT #21432 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I've read people that bitch about fen that call Sam and Dean "the boys" or call Sam "Sammy" in meta or author's notes or the like.
At which point I know even if I'm unhealthily caught up in fiction I'm not defending imaginary peoples' rights to being treated like grown men on the internet.
And? Imma keep calling him Sammy whenever I want.
(Man, those hands are killing me. I might need to draw them)
Matt the Bruins fan - Sep 20, 2011 1:52:40 pm PDT #21433 of 30002
"I remember when they eventually introduced that drug kingpin who murdered people and smuggled drugs inside snakes and I was like 'Finally. A normal person.'” —RahvinDragand
I'll cop to being mildly annoyed when characters who met them as grown men refer to them as "boys." Except Ellen, her vibe with them was maternal enough that her not actually knowing them as children like Bobby did doesn't rankle.
§ ita § - Sep 20, 2011 2:04:13 pm PDT #21434 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
I can see Rufus calling them "the boys", but I can see Rufus calling John "boy". Angels, no problem. Demons too. Who else does it?
Theresa - Sep 20, 2011 2:05:13 pm PDT #21435 of 30002
"What would it take to get your daughter to stop tweeting about this?"
Bobby does it and maybe their Grandpa did it. I don't remember. John did it. Those would all be expected to do it though.
My son's roommate is named Sam and I would be so uncomfortable calling him Sammy after only knowing him for a year.
I want to call him Sammy and rename my own son Dean so that I know Sammy and Dean are living in Lawrence, but luckily my son is legal age and can escape my fan craxiness.
When I am wrapping Sam (the character, not the unsuspecting college kid who doesn't know what a psycho I am) in a blanket, I'm totally going to call him Sammy.