have used touch as comfort when they had scant and few other comforts, reaching back into childhood
Those aren't the guys we see on screen, though. So her fanon is just as valid as yours.
'A Hole in the World'
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
have used touch as comfort when they had scant and few other comforts, reaching back into childhood
Those aren't the guys we see on screen, though. So her fanon is just as valid as yours.
Oh I have no illusions that my particuar perception of Winchesters child and man is at odds with almost all of fandom. It's just--I look at something other people see as sexual and I don't see that. Willful ignorance, in the sense of *ignoring* rather than being ignorant of canon? Almost certainly. But it's no more off the range than the tin hat people. And I like the notion of cuddling for comfort and the reassurance of touch.
I don't expect other people to accept my opinions, or to see what I see. It's just another viewpoint.
Danneel does tend to maintain her cheerful, upbeat public persona, in the face of *years* of being disliked and outright hated in some quarters, and I give her all credit for that. I haven't seen much of her work, but what I have seen, I think she's capable of better, and it would be very nice if she got the opportunity to prove that.
She's the best part of the second Harold and Kumar movie. And it had John Cho in goth makeup and NPH on a unicorn.
She's the best part of the second Harold and Kumar movie. And it had John Cho in goth makeup and NPH on a unicorn.
adds to queueueueue
I don't expect other people to accept my opinions, or to see what I see.
I think it's when people do have those expectations that we get ship wars. Or, when people take it as a personal insult when you don't like something they do.
I find that I'll interpret fanworks according to my own headcanon quite frequently, especially if I've got slashgoggles or gengoggles pre-installed. With some pairings, unless there is actual kissing or sex going on, I'll read emotional intimacy before I'll think physical intimacy. With others, a single glance will get me going "KISS ALREADY!!!1!" How the artist has labeled the work has little to do with this.
adds to queueueueue
It's not actually a good movie. It just had some high points.
Show tonight!!!1!
Exciting, but not enough to post it twice.
Sure it is.
it's no more off the range than the tin hat people
They're so far off the range, I don't know if I'd associate myself with them.
Thirty five minutes!!!
::bounces::