Congratulations to the class of 1999. You all proved more or less adequate.

Snyder ,'Chosen'


Supernatural 2: Why is it our job to save everybody?  

[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US on TV (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though — if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.


Amy - Dec 09, 2010 4:49:13 pm PST #16410 of 30002
Because books.

But it was Meg herself who thought the demon dressed her slutty, and based on the peasant top and the very natural hair, I guess that could just be her take on it?

I don't think she looked slutty, but I think the actual Meg Masters was supposed to feel that the demon made her look that way.

It didn't make a lot of sense to me, since wardrobe is kind of a nothing compared to being in there while the demon is slitting throats and having sex with strangers, but.


§ ita § - Dec 09, 2010 4:52:33 pm PST #16411 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Yeah, I kinda buy it as a character note, except she's in a form fitting top with a lace bodice. So it's not great. Demon!Meg acts all sexed up, but her clothes, I totally can't call them far more provocative. Fashionable, but just not provocative.

since wardrobe is kind of a nothing compared to being in there while the demon is slitting throats and having sex with strangers, but.

Who'd she have sex with?


Amy - Dec 09, 2010 4:54:36 pm PST #16412 of 30002
Because books.

Oh, wait, we know she had sex with strangers while she was in Sam. I guess I just assumed she did while in Meg, but you're right, no citation there.

Ellen's cleavage, by the way, is AWESOME.


§ ita § - Dec 09, 2010 5:06:37 pm PST #16413 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

we know she had sex with strangers while she was in Sam

It's not stated in BUABS. Is it mentioned elsewhere?


Amy - Dec 09, 2010 5:08:08 pm PST #16414 of 30002
Because books.

He doesn't say that at some point?

Um, it's not, I guess? I could very well be thinking of a fic.


§ ita § - Dec 09, 2010 5:10:12 pm PST #16415 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Nope. Just read the transcript. Malt liquor, murder, and menthols. No sex.


Amy - Dec 09, 2010 5:12:55 pm PST #16416 of 30002
Because books.

Maybe Meg was all talk and no action!

Dude, a fic where Meg and Cas were BOTH virgins and fell in LURVE would probably explode some heads nicely.


§ ita § - Dec 09, 2010 5:18:59 pm PST #16417 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

That would be excellent trolling.


Cass - Dec 09, 2010 5:24:06 pm PST #16418 of 30002
Bob's learned to live with tragedy, but he knows that this tragedy is one that won't ever leave him or get better.

But it was Meg herself who thought the demon dressed her slutty, and based on the peasant top and the very natural hair, I guess that could just be her take on it?

Exactly this. The character herself's read on it.

Seriously? Slut? That's harsh. How do you characterise Bela's clothing, or Ellen's cleavage, or Jo's visible stomach?

*I* didn't characterize demon!Meg as dressed slutty, dead Meg did. I think the demon dressed in a more sexually aware or provocative way but a lot of it was attitude too.

Bela was ... I don't even recall. Ellen's cleavage was awesome. She's a woman and I can easily read her as owning her sexuality happily. Jo dressed her age and sense of self. The demon dressed Meg's body in a way that was clearly not comfortable for Meg. That's the difference for me.


§ ita § - Dec 09, 2010 5:31:25 pm PST #16419 of 30002
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Sorry. When you said "far more provocative" you didn't mean that in any sense outside of human!Meg's PoV? Because you said it in a post all by itself, and I thought you were speaking for yourself. And when you say it again in that post, I still can't tell.