That's the stumbling block, ita, in terms of characterization. And most people don't really explore it, except to make Dean his sun, moon, and stars, make him more gay than straight, and sort of claim Dean as the one true thing he *has*.

An aside from the present convo: I watched the Ralph Macchio movie Crossroad (don't judge me. It was there, okay?), and it wasn't even as good as I remembered it. However, I was amused to note there was a bar called Lloyd's in the movie. I can guess Kripke used it as another pop culture tribute.

I'm of two minds about Sam ever truly realising Dean is everything to him, before he leaves for Stanford. Subconsciously I think he relies on him, but something as active as making a move? I mean, assuming the gay and the stuff? Just do not get.

Is the premise that Dean's guilted into acting on feelings he may or may not have realised he had? So as to not make the whole statutory rape thing add on top of the incest stuff? I mean, I'm assuming Sam's at least 14, making Dean 18.

It's not just a squick for me--I plain don't get it. River/Simon? That I can see from canon. Won't read. Can see. Sam/Dean? Totally cannot see. Their huge entanglement which I adore is incredibly and delightfully messed up, but doesn't go there.

I'm of two minds about Sam ever truly realising Dean is everything to him, before he leaves for Stanford.

That's it. I don't really think he gets that until much closer to the present time of the story.

Don't get me wrong -- I've read and written Wincest, but when I truly stand back and look at canon, I don't ever see them going there.

River/Simon, even though I can see it, too, I can't think about because once it's male/female and there's a chance of pregnancy, I really feel the squick. Plus, she's not exactly of sound mind, so.

It's funny--I've read more than once complaints that D/C is OOC. Compared to what? The other slash pairings in the fandom? Seriously? Outside of, what, Bobby/Crowley and Sam/Brady (which I will never let go of, ever), we're all making shit up.

Obviously I'm hugely biased, but we're all on crack.

It's not just a squick for me--I plain don't get it. River/Simon? That I can see from canon. Won't read. Can see. Sam/Dean? Totally cannot see. Their huge entanglement which I adore is incredibly and delightfully messed up, but doesn't go there.

Yes, exactly!

(I make exceptions for dark stuff with demonic possession or Evil!Sam. I'm not proud, just picky.)

watched the Ralph Macchio movie Crossroad (don't judge me. It was there, okay?), and it wasn't even as good as I remembered it.

Steve Vai, guitar player for the Devil!

Sam/Dean? Totally cannot see. Their huge entanglement which I adore is incredibly and delightfully messed up, but doesn't go there.

I once got shouted down for pointing out that all the physical intimacy "tells" someone was citing for a canon Wincest relationship were pretty much normal behavior between bothers who grew up together in each other's pockets, whereas were it happening between unrelated adult friends there might be at least the possibility of something eyebrow-raising going on. I can only assume that the woman I was talking to neither has siblings nor knows anyone who does.

The other story added Dark!Sam to the mix

I like how Sam's own story was handled in Blind Spot, as much as the stories laid out are unfinished by the end. (Sequel! Sequel!)

I can only assume that the woman I was talking to neither has siblings nor knows anyone who does.

Well, different families have different levels of physicality. Mine was a lot less touchy-feely than those of some of my friends.