I believe he could have found someone to take care of them while he was on the road.

Could that someone have (theoretically) have protected them from demons? I think when push came to shove (and this is where the potential fail comes in) he'd rather raise Dean to be someone he trusted to protect the two of them than find someone new to trust instead.

Turns out demons got to Sam anyway, but not for lack of John trying.

I think a lot of what Walter did was out of selfishness and grief

Same can be said of John, seriously. He was motivated by Mary, not the boys.

(And I will argue way more here than anywhere else because I can trust people to realize that we can all love the show and see it differently. Plus sometimes I can argue the logic of one side or another without being emotionally committed to said side.)

He was motivated by Mary, not the boys.

I think he was motivated by the boys too. Admittedly this is influenced by grey canon, but I do think he did the dodgy things for the wrong reasons.

I think when push came to shove, Walter wanted to save Peter's life. And that's admirable. What happened next...gets really murky. But given Walternate's persona? Best of a bad deal, methinks.

Same can be said of John, seriously. He was motivated by Mary, not the boys.

I didn't even know you were keeping up with Fringe! Awesome.

I think the difference, for me, is in terms of collateral damage. Which ... I'm not sure how to explain what I mean without spoilers, and this isn't the right thread anyway. But you're right in the sense that John's vengeance was completely selfish and motivated by grief, too.

(And I will argue way more here than anywhere else because I can trust people to realize that we can all love the show and see it differently. Plus sometimes I can argue the logic of one side or another without being emotionally committed to said side.)

That's why I stay here, warm and safe and cozy. And run my mouth.

Even if they'd been raised by somebody else, Sam still would have died in "All Hell Breaks Loose". But Dean might not have known about the crossroads.

Can we be careful of the fringe spoilers ? I am only partway through season 1, and want to cat h up this summer.

Thanks.

I was pleased that both lists gave Ben Sisko due props for being the best father in the Star Trek cannon.

Sorry, Perkins!

Even if they'd been raised by somebody else, Sam still would have died in "All Hell Breaks Loose".

I don't think that's true. I think an eventual destiny overrides the steps taken to get there.

Sam dying wasn't actually Azazel's plan in the first place, and if Lucifer and the rest of the angels are to be believed, he was always going to end up in Detroit, giving Lucifer a metaphysical piggyback ride.

I feel like I imagine those poor folks did in the threads after the season 5 finale when everyone was comparing the Impala to the yellow crayon and moderators were yelling that they had to stop doing that, since not everyone had seen Buffy (and for God's sake, who hasn't seen Buffy? I've got it on TV as I type this). I don't watch Fringe so all of these comparisons between John and Walter are whooshing right over my head. But I've already argued my viewpoint about John here (I believe he loved his boys, I also believe he was not a good father; I know that this is not necessarily the popular viewpoint in these parts), so I won't drag it out again.

Truth was, at nine, Dean knew more about how to protect them than some kindly neighbor lady.

And now I have this lonely little fic bunny of WeeChesters being babysat by a I'm so dark and spooky! I dabble in the occult! teenager. Hijinks ensue. Someone write this for me.