We have not. I find it interesting that he was raised by his birth parents, if not his genetic parents, and, yeah, I really hope he ends up being fleshed out more.
I generally agree with that review, as well.
'Underneath'
A topic for the discussion of Doctor Who, Arrow, and The Flash. Beware possible invasions of iZombie, Sleepy Hollow, or pretty much any other "genre" (read: sci fi, superhero, or fantasy) show that captures our fancy. Expect adult content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.
Marvel superheroes are discussed over at the MCU thread.
Whitefont all unaired in the U.S. ep discussion, identifying it as such, and including the show and ep title in blackfont.
Blackfont is allowed after the show has aired on the east coast.
This is NOT a general TV discussion thread.
We have not. I find it interesting that he was raised by his birth parents, if not his genetic parents, and, yeah, I really hope he ends up being fleshed out more.
I generally agree with that review, as well.
I don't.
It's 2 to 1, you're outvoted, we're throwing you in the Brig.
...Am I in the right thread?
I more or less agree with that review, too. I don't think Tony was as convincing, or as fully formed, as the other clones, and the fact that no one was questioning Helena's whereabouts seemed really sloppy.
On the other hand, I liked the intercut of Rachel's discussion with Ethan and her trashing her desk, but I think that was because I read it as Rachel being furious that her creators had so clearly decided her biological limitations, and taken away her opportunity to choose.
For the first time, I felt like there was a little bit too much going on for me to follow it properly.
I agree with the article in that I don't like that no one seems to care where Helena is and that the make-up department totally failed in creating Tony, but overall I still really liked this episode.
...Am I in the right thread?
Even in the right thread, justice is not put to a vote.
Even in the right thread, justice is not put to a vote.
Trial by combat!
In on-topic, I agree with sj and Amy.
On the other hand, I liked the intercut of Rachel's discussion with Ethan and her trashing her desk, but I think that was because I read it as Rachel being furious that her creators had so clearly decided her biological limitations, and taken away her opportunity to choose.
I was a little confused about what was going on there, but I did figure it was her reaction after Duncan had gone (confirmed by the writers). I do agree, however, that we haven't gotten enough about Rachel to make her reaction make sense. That reaction is characterization rather than an extension of her characterization.
the make-up department totally failed in creating Tony
It was disappointing what a half-assed job it seemed to be, compared to what they do for everyone else.
The whole "whatever, Helena's off being Helena" was weird too.
Also, in a typically well written show, I could not believe there was an exchange in which Duncan said something and then Mrs. S repeated what he had said with names as if the audience didn't know who the fuck he was talking about.
I'm with you, -t.
Whew. I was ready to be the cheese that stands alone, but it is always nice to have company.