Vampire Diaries: I like Logan SO MUCH better as a vampire. He's just more fun.
Boxed Set, Vol. V: Just a Hint of Denial and a Dash of Retcon
A topic for the discussion of Doctor Who, Arrow, and The Flash. Beware possible invasions of iZombie, Sleepy Hollow, or pretty much any other "genre" (read: sci fi, superhero, or fantasy) show that captures our fancy. Expect adult content and discussion of the Big Gay Sex.
Marvel superheroes are discussed over at the MCU thread.
Whitefont all unaired in the U.S. ep discussion, identifying it as such, and including the show and ep title in blackfont.
Blackfont is allowed after the show has aired on the east coast.
This is NOT a general TV discussion thread.
Drive-by--a totally love picspam of Jack O'Neill over the years: [link]
When fans are debating what they, individually, consider to be "part of the story" that's not canon. They're disagreeing with each other, not with the official version -- because there isn't an official version. And that's what the word "canon" means. There is continuity, and more than a few contradictions within that continuity, but the story's premise is quite tolerant of contradictions, so that's okay. That isn't the same as having a canon.
If Davies refuses to say what is canon, there isn't one. If Moffat says that the word doesn't even apply to Doctor Who, there isn't one.
Here's Paul Cornell on the subject:
Because when you say ‘the books just aren’t “canon!”’ or ‘the books “happened” and the TV show can’t ignore them!’ you’re not saying something like ‘for every action there is an equal but opposite reaction’, you’re saying something like ‘the South will never surrender’. You’re yelling a battle cry, not stating the truth. Because there is no truth here to find. There was never and now cannot be any authority to rule on matters of canonicity in a tale that has allowed, or at the very least accepted, the rewriting of its own continuity.
Personally, I couldn't care less if there is, or isn't, canon.
If it's working on the emotional level of pretty-consisted characters I'm a happy fangirl. Hell, the automatic heaven solutions (as in, send a random character into what the Doctor thinks will be heaven for it) pisses me off a lot more than a "but it wasn't like this in the original show!" cry.
Which is why, I think, in WoM, I immediately understood that something is wrong with the Doctor from the beginning of the episode. For me, he was acting out of the character of Ten - and still being enough Ten left in him - which only showed, IMO, how badly he needs a companion. His sense of jumping into the nearest fire/disaster, a-la Tommy Gavin of Rescue Me, would have been altered into protecting his companion. The companion, in her turn, would have make sure the price of said protection won't be the life of a timelord, unless it's a season finale.
And ION, I think it's time to see a woman Doctor. I figured that Doctor couldn't regenerate himself into a woman - something in the genetics, or something - but I'd sure love to see a woman in that role, facing the universe, with all of its wonders and horrible parts.
I'd love to see what Judi Dench could do with the role.
Michelle Forbes, maybe.
My first thought, actually, went to Glenn Close. I don't know why.
Then I thought of Helena Bonham Carter, and then, given her acting in Dollhouse, I thought it'll be interesting seeing Amy Acker tries the part.
Is the world, or rather, Britain, ready for an American Doctor?
I think an American Doctor might cause riots at the BBC.
I'm ready for an American Doctor.
One that will have to fake his/her accent, but I'm ready for one.