No, but I've decided to compromise for now. I really want to explore this issue, but I don't think this is the time. So, I'm going to leave the question in the paper and address it in the discussion section--that it's really out of the scope of this project, but is something that should be addressed by me or someone else at a later time.
Sounds like an excellent compromise! Shows you recognize the issue is there, but acknowledge it's beyond current scope. Plus, putting it in the discussion section should give you more exploration - assuming someone "discusses" with you. Is this the Oral History Tradition thing, or have I missed another Major Project in my lurking?
However, I could meet for venting post-work (which prob. doesn't work with your schedule).
Not so much, unless you wanted to come with me to pick up Matilda and hang out at our place for drinks and muttergrumbling. Which you're totally welcome to do!
You know what mittens I miss? The ones on STRINGS. I need them terribly and can never find them.
you wanted to come with me to pick up Matilda and hang out at our place for drinks and muttergrumbling. Which you're totally welcome to do!
Hrm. I can't tonight (I have to clean, because a friend is coming to visit tomorrow), but next week would be awesome. I could also lunch next week. Yes, let us email and figure this out.
So jealous just now of JZ and Juliana and proximity and stuff...
Huh, I just discovered another requirement for my potential future wife:
She has to have a brother.
Happy birthday, Anne!
I wish I had a baby close by I could could cuddle and hug (and call George). I'm missing my baby relatives!
Why, P-C?
Because she has to have a brother.
That's all I got. It's all part of "having a good family," I guess. She wants my kids to have more uncles?
