To me its not the showing of skin, its the lameness of costume.
You can dress as a cop.
You can add some sort of visual commentary and dress as "police brutality"
But if you just put on a short tight dress with a badge and a hat you're not dressed as something, you just look hot in a goofy way. And I suppose that once that had its own cleverness, but now its just a default. And you're not dressed
as
anything.
Surely there could be clever exceptions... "sexy burqua" could be awesome. And you can dress as something sexy and have it be a costume. But Sexy Nurse, Sexy Astronaut, Sexy Sexworker is just sort of tired.
why make a girls' and boys' version when they haven't developed yet?
Because girls wear pink, silly.
But why the rash of costumes for girls that are sexy/slutty? especially sized for those who haven't developed yet?
But why the rash of costumes for girls that are sexy/slutty? especially sized for those who haven't developed yet?
In the UK M&S came out with a range of "sexy underwear" products -- for kids, aged 6. They got withdrawn.
Oh, wait, I do feel better about that page of costumes, realizing that that's what comes up when you search for "Girls Costumes." The boy page includes some other ridiculous stuff, but not as much: [link]
Eeeewwww. For God's sake, let the kids be kids!
ETA: This was in response to Kevin's underwear post.
Engineer costume on that page is adorable!
But why the rash of costumes for girls that are sexy/slutty? especially sized for those who haven't developed yet?
Yeah, I got no rage reducing rationale on those.
Yeah, those pictures were disturbing. Not only the costumes, but the way they were posing.
Uh. I think Playboy just left me a voicemail about a digital asset management position. I think I need to call back after work, because I
must
know.
Ok, the "occupations" included a "french maid" costume for a kid. Ew.
Cause, you know, kid not dressed as an actual french maid of any era, just dressed as a fetishized french maid. ew ew ew ew ewwwwwwwww