I think her lemming dive into martyrdom may be speeded by the belief that she's already killed people.
Lorne ,'Why We Fight'
Supernatural 1: Saving People, Hunting Things - the Family Business
[NAFDA]. This is where we talk about the CW series Supernatural! Anything that's aired in the US (including promos) is fair game. No spoilers though -- if you post one by accident, an admin will delete it.
In the moment, I'm crying. It HURTS.
Later, it will unravel like a cheap sweater. But then I'll watch again and want to hug all of them, and cry again.
Oh, Sammy.
(Though his teary face still makes me giggle for no reason I can define.)
Oh, Dean.
As an actor, you use what you need to to get where you need to go, emotionally. Rumor has it that JP imagined that his dogs were sick or injured because of his own mistake or neglect, and he was having to have them put down to get into the headspace for that scene. Yes, somebody wrote a fic about it, but it was apparently based on a morsel of truth.
...I just...find it...ironic...that it was his dogs. This makes me a bad person, doesn't it?
Maybe just not a dog person?
Maybe he thought a close family member would be too much?
(Half a minute later, I get the irony.)
I think her lemming dive into martyrdom may be speeded by the belief that she's already killed people.I just wish they'd let her say any of that instead of talking about the future and what might happen. Because the guilt of what she'd already done is far more plausible for me.
But at that point in the season arc, she was Sam's avatar, so the lines she was speaking were what we assumed Sam was thinking.
I remember at the time being not so much sad for Madison or Sam, but being appalled and terribly sympathetic for Dean and what he was looking at having to do to or for Sam if things went bad. And also, feeling like, for the first time, maybe Sam understood what he'd asked Dean to do for him in Playthings. It's a completely different perspective from here, I think.
Yup. I have issues with "Heart". Especially since my one thought about it--that they were trying to get us to question Winchester black-and-white morality, what with "Heart" and "Croatoan"--didn't pan out, so I'm left going, WTF?
And... well, not to rain on the parade, but can we please not be down on the casting spoilers? There's an awful lot of not-very-veiled misogyny out in the rest of fandom about the casting spoilers, and frankly I'm a bit surprised to see people complaining about them here as well.
For my part, I think it could be interesting, not to mention the fact that the Js kind of need a break, given that they're in nearly every scene of the show, and that has to be exhausting.
Just a thought, and I in no way mean to imply that anyone here is being misogynistic. Y'all are, of course, free to ignore me or tell me to shut my cakehole.
Pls to not be shutting cakehole, Consuela. As a guilty party I'm a bit appalled at myself.
Not long ago I was urging others with the same words you're using. It was the "B" word, and the oh-so-typical CW PR that got my back up about the sitch. I will attempt to keep an open mind.
You won't mind the silent stinkeye, though, till I know for sure?
Whitefont: I definitely agree that it could be interesting, and I'm sporting my "In Kripke We Trust" button. But I also don't want my angsty wonderful brothers-against-the-world story to get filled up with gratuitous eye candy just for the sake of appealing to a demographic. I'm definitely in favor of female characters with agency.