Here are the poll results:
'Help'
Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
Wow. That was...wow. Thank you for coordinating the poll, msbelle and poll posse. I learned a lot. Reading the comments was especially eye-opening. I'll need to digest for a bit before I can comment more specifically than that.
Oh, one thing I noticed--I got confused by the "essential thread" percentages at first. Just wanted to point out the the percentages next to individual threads are based on the number of people who chose that thread; i.e. if four people picked B'crxy and two picked it as their first choice, there will be a 50% in that column. I found it a lot easier to ignore the 1st, 2nd, 3rd thing and just look at total numbers of people who picked each thread to get a better sense of overall preferences.
Seeing the whole thing out there... the effort you put into pulling the whole thing together is damn near heroic. Thank you.
Have to read and re-read and ponder. Some of the comments are making me all prickly and defensive, which is somewhat less than useful.
Poll ees eeenterestink.
I found it a lot easier to ignore the 1st, 2nd, 3rd thing and just look at total numbers of people who picked each thread to get a better sense of overall preferences.
Same here. That confused me at first as well.
I'm fascinated and amused by the poll results. The comments in particular.
I agree -- really fascinating stuff in the comments at the end.
The one that pinged me in particular was the accusation that we are a "closed community." I think it was meant as a jab, but for me, that closeness is one of the reasons this is my primary internet home.
Also interesting that Boxed Set came in third on the most-essential threads question. I wouldn't have guessed that before.
I think it was meant as a jab, but for me, that closeness is one of the reasons this is my primary internet home.
Jabs can be true.
Wow. That's an amazing mass of data.
I think one of the things I'm getting from the comments is that not as many folks as I thought care that b.org isn't just another board. That's food for thought. I may be reading it wrong, weighting it wrong, always possible. But that's the feeling I get off the comments, in general.
In any case, you guys did an AWESOME job putting it together. You should all get, like, free bagels for a year, or something!
Here are the poll results:
I am so glad we did that.
Big majority of folks just fine with the way things are.
Some impulse to put a check on thread creation, but without changing the voting method drastically. Raising the quorum threshold seems to be the most popular (and frankly easiest and most sensible [I think] solution).
People come to talk TV. More TV threads would enhance the experience. But still a lot of people come for the socializing.
One of the comments struck me - noting that threads which create their own mini culture like Boxed Set or Minearverse or what Spoilers used are more divisive/diluting than single show threads.
I think that is sort of true, but I don't see that as a negative. That makes me turn my head around a little since I really like the Box Set culture (even though I don't participate there) and really liked the little Spoilers subgroup that used to be (that's where I got all my hang time with Le Nubian!).
Ultimately, the most diluting thing that ever happend on B.org was Bitches becoming it's own place. Except that didn't dilute the experience - it just created a different subset of interaction.