A dragon is for life, not just Hogswatchnight.
Zoe: Preacher, don't the Bible have some pretty specific things to say about killing? Book: Quite specific. It is, however, somewhat fuzzier on the subject of kneecaps.
'War Stories'
Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
-t - Dec 05, 2011 11:05:13 pm PST #5081 of 6786
I am a woman of various inclinations and only some of the time are they to burn everything down in frustration
Deena - Dec 06, 2011 5:14:21 am PST #5082 of 6786
How are you me? You need to stop that. Only I can be me. ~Kara
I like "Maybe the even years are better."
I like this one too... (unsurprisingly)
sumi - Dec 06, 2011 5:22:34 am PST #5083 of 6786
Art Crawl!!!
Yeah, I like the dragon one AND THE "the even years are better. "
§ ita § - Dec 06, 2011 7:52:49 am PST #5084 of 6786
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Done.
DCJensen - Jan 01, 2012 6:51:02 pm PST #5085 of 6786
All is well that ends in pizza.
So whereinthehell do we discuss "Sherlock" now that it's back?
White font in procedurals?
Liese S. - Jan 01, 2012 7:53:40 pm PST #5086 of 6786
"Faded like the lilac, he thought."
Is it airing in Britain and not here? Then I'd say Unamerican, right?
Cass - Jan 01, 2012 8:37:22 pm PST #5087 of 6786
Bob's learned to live with tragedy, but he knows that this tragedy is one that won't ever leave him or get better.
Unam.
§ ita § - Jan 02, 2012 8:09:32 am PST #5088 of 6786
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Right now guest star information is considered spoilery even if there is no character information conveyed in it.
I don't know how this came to be designated a spoiler. Does anyone have background for that? James Marsters showing up on Angel is one thing, but showing up on Torchwood for the first time something entirely different. I don't think it should be whitefont mandatory, and with the upswing in portable devices, it gets more complicated to read spoiler-fonted information.
So I'd like to be sure that what's mandated to be spoiler fonted really is considered sensitive by people, especially in a NAFDA thread.
Vortex - Jan 02, 2012 8:27:18 am PST #5089 of 6786
"Cry havoc and let slip the boobs of war!" -- Miracleman
Sometimes knowing the guest star conveys the character information, even if it's not a big name. I spoiled by accident once by saying that someone was going to be on a show that I had recently started watching, and it turns out that the guest star had been on the show before and mentioning him let others know that the character would be back.
So, you never know when you're going to spoil, and I think that our philosophy is better safe than spoiled.
§ ita § - Jan 02, 2012 8:31:50 am PST #5090 of 6786
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.
Well, if it's an actor playing an established role, then it's obviously got spoiler all over it.
However, if I tell you James Marsters is on GA next month, what do you know? Finding out that an actor's been on a show before is pretty simple.
I don't think that's safe, I think it's random.
I guess, I just frustrated even though I can see people's source posts easier than most.
I don't see why a new actor is at all spoilery, and I don't think it's much to ask for people to make sure it's a new actor before they talk about it.
How else am I going to know that Enver is in the next show he's in, without opening myself up to being actually spoilt for stuff?