If they've only been aired on the Internets then they are.
Really? Even if you provide a link to the trailer so everyone can watch? We talk about movie trailers all the time without whitefont.
'Time Bomb'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
If they've only been aired on the Internets then they are.
Really? Even if you provide a link to the trailer so everyone can watch? We talk about movie trailers all the time without whitefont.
Really? Even if you provide a link to the trailer so everyone can watch? We talk about movie trailers all the time without whitefont.
Yes. The point of not having spoilers is that some people don't WANT to know, so linking to the trailer doesn't solve the issue. Plus, movie trailers are aired on TV.
I don't think we've explicitly had a trailer/spoiler rule for movies. It's fallen into whitefonting, because there's no simple place to have seen it--I know where my Buffy trailer is going to come from, but not as much about The Dark Knight Returns.
Yeah, I was thinking of TV shows. I agree that there hasn't been a clear rule about movies.
Luckily, most of the time, any trailer that spoils the whole movie is for a movie that sucks donkey balls, so it's not much of an issue.
TV trailers, OTOH, well let's just say that some networks are really, really dumb.
TV trailers, OTOH, well let's just say that some networks are really, really dumb.
Two words: Monkey. Crack.
Going back to an earlier part of the conversation, I'd like to formally propose eliminating "no preference" as a voting option and also revisit the minimum number of votes needed for a vote to count. I'm not going to propose a specific number at this point, because I could be persuaded that just getting rid of no preference serves the purpose, and I'm not sure what the right number would be anyway.
I did a quick scan of the past 10 votes (which appears to be all of them since April 2007) and the average number of votes cast was 72.5, max of 93 and min of 49.
This is interesting.
I'd like to formally propose eliminating "no preference" as a voting option and also revisit the minimum number of votes needed for a vote to count.
I'll second that.
I'll third.
I'll fourth.