Woo hoo! Lightbulbs, please.
Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
As a point of irony, any vote on eliminating the no preference option would still have to have the no preference option.
Ha!
Although, I think it's always been an option, not a requirement.
Although, I think it's always been an option, not a requirement.
But if it's an option we wouldn't need a vote to get rid of it. If we need the vote to get rid of it, it's a requirement and must be included.
I think that made sense.
I want to eliminate it as an option.
As a point of irony, any vote on eliminating the no preference option would still have to have the no preference option.
It has never been a requirement, it has been up to the individual proposer to include it if they so desired. I assume this proposal would be more along the lines of banning it as an option.
I don't have the stats in front of me, but I have looked at them in the past. As I recall, there have always been enough Yes and No votes alone (i.e. 42 of 'em) to pass or fail every primary item on every ballot. The only time(s) there haven't been enough Yes and No votes (I forget if it's been more than once), it's been the secondary items like spoiler policy for the proposed thread.
So, I have (off the top of my head) two issues with eliminating NP as an option. 1) Like voter ID laws, it seems like a solution looking for a problem and 2) What do we do if enough people vote to create a thread, but not enough vote on things like its spoiler policy?
Is this not the discussion to have in Lightbulbs?
Lightbulbs isn't open yet.
It is now.