I don't think we've explicitly had a trailer/spoiler rule for movies. It's fallen into whitefonting, because there's no simple place to have seen it--I know where my Buffy trailer is going to come from, but not as much about The Dark Knight Returns.
Giles ,'Lies My Parents Told Me'
Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura
Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina
Yeah, I was thinking of TV shows. I agree that there hasn't been a clear rule about movies.
Luckily, most of the time, any trailer that spoils the whole movie is for a movie that sucks donkey balls, so it's not much of an issue.
TV trailers, OTOH, well let's just say that some networks are really, really dumb.
TV trailers, OTOH, well let's just say that some networks are really, really dumb.
Two words: Monkey. Crack.
Going back to an earlier part of the conversation, I'd like to formally propose eliminating "no preference" as a voting option and also revisit the minimum number of votes needed for a vote to count. I'm not going to propose a specific number at this point, because I could be persuaded that just getting rid of no preference serves the purpose, and I'm not sure what the right number would be anyway.
I did a quick scan of the past 10 votes (which appears to be all of them since April 2007) and the average number of votes cast was 72.5, max of 93 and min of 49.
This is interesting.
I'd like to formally propose eliminating "no preference" as a voting option and also revisit the minimum number of votes needed for a vote to count.
I'll second that.
I'll third.
I'll fourth.
Woo hoo! Lightbulbs, please.
As a point of irony, any vote on eliminating the no preference option would still have to have the no preference option.