I don't give a good gorram about relevant, Wash. Or objective. And I ain't so afraid of losing something that I ain't gonna try to have it. You and I would make one beautiful baby. And I want to meet that child one day. Period.

Zoe ,'Heart Of Gold'


Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: Jon B, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych, msbelle, shrift, Dana, Laura

Stompy Emerita: ita, DXMachina


Kat - Aug 19, 2007 6:58:27 pm PDT #1423 of 6786
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

But your second time for a Drama thread can't be discussed for 6 months. According to our rules. So yeah. Bring it up again 6 months to the day it was voted down. But until then, if you want a generic drama thread, quirky or not, you have to wait until then.


Kat - Aug 19, 2007 7:01:40 pm PDT #1424 of 6786
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

Or if you are insistent that you want to vote on it sooner rather than later, propose changing the voting rules to allow you to discuss before the 6-month period is over.


Denise - Aug 19, 2007 7:02:15 pm PDT #1425 of 6786

I think the moritorium would only apply to a proposal for a thread that would encompass all of Network Drama. Any further division seems to me to be a different concept and a different proposal. Any further reshuffling after that would be different proposals. To try to say now that this is against the rules seems unfair to me. Maybe people would have voted differently on the Network Drama thread proposal if they had known that future proposals for different smaller buckets wouldn't be okay.


§ ita § - Aug 19, 2007 7:03:30 pm PDT #1426 of 6786
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

If it's good enough for Boxed Set, why isn't it good enough for this?

How is it good enough for Boxed Set? Boxed Set has the clearest of definitions (I mean, if you skip the media fannish thing). It's not an "all what's left" thread like the one you propose.

To me sff is clearer than comedy or procedural, because of the way we've been working it trumps any other--comedy fantasy or procedural sci fi fall right into it.


Jon B. - Aug 19, 2007 7:04:10 pm PDT #1427 of 6786
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

Any further division seems to me to be a different concept and a different proposal.

Not speaking for Kat, but the issue I have is that (IMO) "quirky" isn't a refinement.

(edited for context)


Denise - Aug 19, 2007 7:08:08 pm PDT #1428 of 6786

So if the "quirky" thread was redefined to include specific shows that wouldn't be in the Comedy or the Procedural bucket (maybe any other show from the poll that had 10 or more votes), would that make people feel better? And we could further vote to add new shows to it as the need arose?

Not even sure if a thread like that would pass, just trying to better understand what people's specific issues are.


Kat - Aug 19, 2007 7:09:24 pm PDT #1429 of 6786
"I keep to a strict diet of ill-advised enthusiasm and heartfelt regret." Leigh Bardugo

Thank you, Jon. Quirky is just a nebulous adjective that does not work to reduce a Network Drama thread into a smaller drama thread.

To try to say now that this is against the rules seems unfair to me.

To try to pass a network drama thread with another name is against the rules and is unfair.


Lee - Aug 19, 2007 7:11:22 pm PDT #1430 of 6786
The feeling you get when your brain finally lets your heart get in its pants.

So if the "quirky" thread was redefined to include specific shows that wouldn't be in the Comedy or the Procedural bucket (maybe any other show from the poll that had 10 or more votes), would that make people feel better?

If there was something that distinguished it from the overall drama thread that just got voted down, sure. I'm just not seeing anything that does.


msbelle - Aug 19, 2007 7:13:16 pm PDT #1431 of 6786
I remember the crazy days. 500 posts an hour. Nubmer! Natgbsb

t can't sleep

This is not the place to work out a proposal. If you want to vote on it or think it is worth working out, then second it and it can move to Lightbulbs for sorting out and debate and heated discussions.

As it stands SA made a proposal here: SA "Bureaucracy 4: Like Job. No, really, just like Job" Aug 19, 2007 7:06:23 pm PDT


Jon B. - Aug 19, 2007 7:13:48 pm PDT #1432 of 6786
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

So if the "quirky" thread was redefined to include specific shows that wouldn't be in the Comedy or the Procedural bucket (maybe any other show from the poll that had 10 or more votes), would that make people feel better? And we could further vote to add new shows to it as the need arose?

Comedy isn't drama, so excluding Comedy from this newly proposed thread is irrelevant.

Excluding "Procedurals" is trickier. It's certainly less vague than "quirky", but I'm not sure if the line is white enough.