I like books. I just don't want to take on too much. Do they have an introduction to the modern blurb?

Buffy ,'Lessons'


Cable Drama: Still Waiting for the Cable Guy to Show Up with the Thread Name...

To be determined... (but it's definitely [NAFDA])


§ ita § - Dec 05, 2009 4:01:02 pm PST #3734 of 11998
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Neal has a jones for brains. He had a total mancrush on Tulane's spicy brains. I think it started that he wanted to be trusted just so that he could have an angle on getting Kate, but he's grown to respect Peter, and wants that to be mutual.

As for the setup, it's hard to believe that Peter is the bad guy Neal's been assuming the man with the ring has been. If he's doing something not bad with that, he still seems to be in trouble with the FBI (unless they're monitoring Elizabeth).


Zenkitty - Dec 05, 2009 4:02:59 pm PST #3735 of 11998
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

True, and true.


le nubian - Dec 05, 2009 4:19:11 pm PST #3736 of 11998
"And to be clear, I am the hell. And the high water."

Zenkitty,

Peter is sitting there, but we don't know how he got there: for example, I'm imagining that he got hip to someone setting him up and found the ring and Kate's address in Neal's subpoenaed papers. He shows up there to talk to Kate about the man who really has her "captive."

Another option is that he found the ring among Kate's things and is challenging her on trying to double-cross Neal.


§ ita § - Dec 05, 2009 4:23:38 pm PST #3737 of 11998
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

If he just found the ring, I think it's weird that he put it on.

If he's been working with Kate to get to Neal's stash this whole time, it totally ruins the relationship--but also the premise of the show, so I'm thinking it has to be something sympathetic and forgivable.

Kate really looks like Elizabeth, huh?


Zenkitty - Dec 05, 2009 6:45:54 pm PST #3738 of 11998
Every now and then, I think I might actually be a little odd.

Yeah, I don't think Peter would put the ring on unless it was his own. But like you say, ita, it has to be something understandable or the premise of the show is ruined.

Bizarre theory: Kate's the real villian in the piece. She's screwing with Neal, trying to get him to give up his stash - she was all "just tell me where it is OMG!"; even Neal was suspicious of that. And why would she stick by him for almost four years and then leave him four months before he was getting out? Peter is the one who got her to leave Neal, probably using her criminal record to coerce her, because Neal was about to get out of prison and he and Kate and the stash would've been gone. Kate might even have been planning to kill Neal for the money. Peter didn't just arrest her because he wants to use her to get Neal's stash - it's all stolen stuff that legally should be returned to its rightful owners. Maybe he's got Kate on a leash just like he does Neal, and he's just realized Kate is messing with him. Doesn't explain why Fowler is suspicious of Peter, though. Maybe Peter's arrangement with Kate isn't as aboveboard as his with Neal.

Kate really looks like Elizabeth, huh?

Yes, I thought so too. Quick bizarre soap-opera theory #2, based solely on Kate's looks: Kate is Elizabeth's estranged daughter (Kate could be 22 and Elizabeth could have had her at 18, which makes El 40) and Peter is trying to get her away from Neal because Neal is a bad influence. Maybe Kate's involvement is what made Peter so determined to catch Neal in the first place. So, Peter talked Kate into leaving Neal but she left Neal clues to finding her because she's trying to double-cross both Peter and Neal and get Neal's stash. Maybe Kate's been working with Fowler and she's the one who's been in Peter's house to bug his phone and that's how he knows she's messing with him and Peter is now confronting her with the truth. Ta-dah. Whew.


Sophia Brooks - Dec 06, 2009 1:13:03 pm PST #3739 of 11998
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here

Holy Moses! I just finished Sons of Anarchy (I mainlined Season 2 in 3 days). Holy mother of Cliffhangers! Also, what happened to Tara (I think I missed it).

And, were we supposed to feel sympathy for her with the hospital admin? Because, I really felt for the hospital admin.

And, do we think baby!Jax is going to a hell dimension where he will grow up to hate his evil but good daddy?


Aims - Dec 06, 2009 5:35:34 pm PST #3740 of 11998
Shit's all sorts of different now.

I am giving the heads up that I might need to poke the hivemind on Mad Men stuff over the next couple of weeks. I am writing a final paper for my lit crit class and I'm writing it on Don and Betty Draper using a social/historical context and also on Betty herself using Marilyn French's Gender Principles. So I might need to ask for examples from past seasons that I'm unsure of. I have Season 1 on iTunes, but don't have Season 2. So any help that can be given would be awesome and I think y'all in advance. MWAH!!


DavidS - Dec 06, 2009 5:54:42 pm PST #3741 of 11998
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Aims, I will refer you to the Mad Man footnotes website to start.

Also, the Mad Men review section at the AV Club will have synopsis for every ep.

Or you can just ask us.


Aims - Dec 06, 2009 5:58:47 pm PST #3742 of 11998
Shit's all sorts of different now.

Wooot!! Thanks!


DavidS - Dec 06, 2009 6:06:04 pm PST #3743 of 11998
"Look, son, if it's good enough for Shirley Bassey, it's good enough for you."

Also, should you ever need inspiration watch this.