Hmph.
Peter is not evil. PretendEvilPeter is sexy though.
'The Cautionary Tale of Numero Cinco'
To be determined... (but it's definitely [NAFDA])
Hmph.
Peter is not evil. PretendEvilPeter is sexy though.
There is no way that Peter is evil.
And thank goodness we only have to wait til January and not sometime next summer!
PretendEvilPeter is sexy though
Right?
PretendEvilPeter is sexy though.
There is that.
PretendEvilPeter is sexy though.
We could see more of him. That'd be okay.
So, is it because Bomer is gay that the interactions between Neal and Peter are so slashy, or would that subtext likely be text anyway? The scene where Peter put Neal in handcuffs was rather hot, and I doubt that was intentional.
"He's MY bitch responsibility."
is it because Bomer is gay that the interactions between Neal and Peter are so slashy
There's enough bromance and slash overtones out there where both actors are straight that I don't see why this would have to play into it. Bomer plays Neal as absolutely desirous of Peter's approval, but I think the slash is pretty standard.
Okay, I think the Black man (Jones) is involved in this. I think he is working with someone else to set Peter up. I don't think Jones has enough authority to be doing this whole thing on his own.
Interesting theory.
And darn it - because I like Jones too.
It would explain why Sharif Atkins has just been guesting this whole time.
Wait, how can someone be setting Peter up when it's Peter sitting there? Obviously Peter knows whats going on. What did I miss? (Possibly a lot. I miss things.) But Jones a bad guy, I do not want.
There's enough bromance and slash overtones out there where both actors are straight that I don't see why this would have to play into it.
Yeah, probably not. I'm not always able to see the nuances.
Bomer plays Neal as absolutely desirous of Peter's approval, but I think the slash is pretty standard.
Why does Neal want Peter's approval so much? He put him in prison; you'd think there'd be some resentment.