I can't imagine an IPO could move forward without at least the consent of all named partners.
That said, I'm more outraged by Don on behalf of Joan than the other way around.
To be determined... (but it's definitely [NAFDA])
I can't imagine an IPO could move forward without at least the consent of all named partners.
That said, I'm more outraged by Don on behalf of Joan than the other way around.
The other question I had was if Jaguar had been retained but they lost Vick's that would have been a bit of a pickle. Don *and* Pete fucked up really badly.
Also, Roger has had to smooth things over after Don's actions before. So why they thought it was a good idea not to have Pete along...bizarre.
What is the connection between Vick's and Jaguar? Was the Jaguar guy a friend of Pete's father in law?
Jaguar was their prestige account, Vick's was the biggest moneymaker. So losing only Jaguar would have been bad, but not catastrophic for the IPO. Losing Vick's is a huge blow to their (potential) stock price.
Oh, okay.
Although I must admit I'm not sure how they - running a national campaign for Jaguar wound up trying to cater to a local Jaguar dealer. (At least that's what Jag dude seemed like to me.)
Although I must admit I'm not sure how they - running a national campaign for Jaguar wound up trying to cater to a local Jaguar dealer.
Herb was the head of the Dealer's Association which was putting up half the money for the campaign along with Jaguar proper (the English guys).
The other question I had was if Jaguar had been retained but they lost Vick's that would have been a bit of a pickle. Don *and* Pete fucked up really badly.
Well, in all fairness to Pete, he was in the wrong place at the wrong time. His problem is that he thought that it was MAD as Ken said, it was his wife's father. All bets are off when it comes to his little girl.
Of course, the dad is short sighted in not realizing that in screwing Pete, he's screwing Trudy. He would have been better off forcing them to pull Pete off the account so that people would have realized that Pete did something, but he would still be making money.
Also, Roger has had to smooth things over after Don's actions before. So why they thought it was a good idea not to have Pete along...bizarre.
Maybe Herb doesn't like Pete?
So why they thought it was a good idea not to have Pete along...bizarre.
Herb didn't want Pete there, I think? Roger said something along those lines.
So much cloak&dagger no one telling anyone else what they were doing stuff going on!
Well, in all fairness to Pete, he was in the wrong place at the wrong time. His problem is that he thought that it was MAD as Ken said, it was his wife's father. All bets are off when it comes to his little girl.
Which was a nice parallel to earlier when Pete said something to Trudy about sex being the best thing they had together and Trudy pointed out that, no that would be their daughter. I'm not sure Pete really understands why Trudy's father would do what he did. And he didn't seem to have that kind of relationship with his own parents either.
Of course, the dad is short sighted in not realizing that in screwing Pete, he's screwing Trudy.
I'm sure he'd prefer having the marriage ended and Trudy and his granddaughter living at home with him.
That's why he said that Pete "would do the right thing." Which is to say, he knew Pete would tattle on him because that's how Pete is. And he knew that would end the marriage.