Monty: Whaddya mean she ain't my wife? Mal: She ain't your wife... cause she's married to me.

'Trash'


Buffistas Building a Better Board  

Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.

To-do list


Polter-Cow - Oct 24, 2004 9:23:19 am PDT #8477 of 10000
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

Looking at your quoted text, P-C, I see an open tag at: "I killed him."

I know. Like I said, I understand what the problem was. What I don't understand is how the board went about fixing it. What I'm saying is, I broke something. Fix it.

Lemme try something.

Here is a line
And a line

It converted the open BR to a closing bold tag, which made it think the previous BR was an open bold tag and thus converted the BR to a bR. Freaky.


Gus - Oct 24, 2004 9:25:10 am PDT #8478 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

Looking at your quoted text, P-C, I see an open tag at: "I killed him." < BR"

The tag-matcher will assume that " <br" is enough, although it shouldn't. Your find goes on the list for fixing, on a non-drunk-and-watching-viddies day.


DCJensen - Oct 25, 2004 3:16:37 pm PDT #8479 of 10000
All is well that ends in pizza.

Too bad there's no way to set a variable in a user's profile whether to see whitefont as white or non-white.

Thread specific, doubly so.

---

Hey, my inquiry as to the rolling of post overflow into a new post turned out to be feasable, I thought I would muse anew...


Jon B. - Oct 25, 2004 4:33:14 pm PDT #8480 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

Too bad there's no way to set a variable in a user's profile whether to see whitefont as white or non-white.

It's definitely possible. We talked at one time of having user-specific stylesheets and the whitefont is, or could easily be made, a style.

Is it a style? I can't remember. Let's check:

Am I a style?

t edit Nope. It's just a font color="ffffff" substitution, but that's not a barrier.


Gus - Oct 25, 2004 4:43:32 pm PDT #8481 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

Yeah, Jon, that's a good play. I have that part of the code open now. I could replace the font part of the 's' quickedit with a div enclosure, if we think that is way to go.

The administration of user style sheets is a larger issue, of course, but the quickedit change would lay some foundation for that day.


§ ita § - Oct 25, 2004 4:43:52 pm PDT #8482 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

It should be a style anyway, just so it's not tied in the HTML to the colour of the background.


Gus - Oct 25, 2004 4:56:39 pm PDT #8483 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

Should be a style anyway, just so it's not tied in the HTML to the colour of the background.

I'm thinking in these terms:

. spoiler { font-family: "MS Sans Serif"; color: transparent; }

Which will allow changes in background color, without losing the blinvisbility of the spoiler.


Jon B. - Oct 25, 2004 5:01:49 pm PDT #8484 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

There should already be something in the stylesheet. It's a class called "white-plus-sign". Not the best name, but I think it'll work.


Gus - Oct 25, 2004 5:05:57 pm PDT #8485 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

"white-plus-sign" is committed to white. The "transparent" color val works fine with backgrounds that are not white.


Jon B. - Oct 25, 2004 5:07:51 pm PDT #8486 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

Sorry -- I meant that we could change the white-plus-sign to transparent and it would do what it's currently doing as well as the spoiler font stuff.

t edit In fact, if we're talking about letting people change the background color, then we have to change the white-plus-sign class to work with that.