Now, I can hold a note for a long time...actually I can hold a note forever. But eventually that's just noise. It's the change we're listening for. The note coming after, and the one after that. That's what makes it music.

Host ,'Why We Fight'


Buffistas Building a Better Board  

Do you have problems, concerns or recommendations about the technical side of the Phoenix? Air them here. Compliments also welcome.

To-do list


Polter-Cow - Oct 24, 2004 9:23:19 am PDT #8477 of 10000
What else besides ramen can you scoop? YOU CAN SCOOP THIS WORLD FROM DARKNESS!

Looking at your quoted text, P-C, I see an open tag at: "I killed him."

I know. Like I said, I understand what the problem was. What I don't understand is how the board went about fixing it. What I'm saying is, I broke something. Fix it.

Lemme try something.

Here is a line
And a line

It converted the open BR to a closing bold tag, which made it think the previous BR was an open bold tag and thus converted the BR to a bR. Freaky.


Gus - Oct 24, 2004 9:25:10 am PDT #8478 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

Looking at your quoted text, P-C, I see an open tag at: "I killed him." < BR"

The tag-matcher will assume that " <br" is enough, although it shouldn't. Your find goes on the list for fixing, on a non-drunk-and-watching-viddies day.


DCJensen - Oct 25, 2004 3:16:37 pm PDT #8479 of 10000
All is well that ends in pizza.

Too bad there's no way to set a variable in a user's profile whether to see whitefont as white or non-white.

Thread specific, doubly so.

---

Hey, my inquiry as to the rolling of post overflow into a new post turned out to be feasable, I thought I would muse anew...


Jon B. - Oct 25, 2004 4:33:14 pm PDT #8480 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

Too bad there's no way to set a variable in a user's profile whether to see whitefont as white or non-white.

It's definitely possible. We talked at one time of having user-specific stylesheets and the whitefont is, or could easily be made, a style.

Is it a style? I can't remember. Let's check:

Am I a style?

t edit Nope. It's just a font color="ffffff" substitution, but that's not a barrier.


Gus - Oct 25, 2004 4:43:32 pm PDT #8481 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

Yeah, Jon, that's a good play. I have that part of the code open now. I could replace the font part of the 's' quickedit with a div enclosure, if we think that is way to go.

The administration of user style sheets is a larger issue, of course, but the quickedit change would lay some foundation for that day.


§ ita § - Oct 25, 2004 4:43:52 pm PDT #8482 of 10000
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

It should be a style anyway, just so it's not tied in the HTML to the colour of the background.


Gus - Oct 25, 2004 4:56:39 pm PDT #8483 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

Should be a style anyway, just so it's not tied in the HTML to the colour of the background.

I'm thinking in these terms:

. spoiler { font-family: "MS Sans Serif"; color: transparent; }

Which will allow changes in background color, without losing the blinvisbility of the spoiler.


Jon B. - Oct 25, 2004 5:01:49 pm PDT #8484 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

There should already be something in the stylesheet. It's a class called "white-plus-sign". Not the best name, but I think it'll work.


Gus - Oct 25, 2004 5:05:57 pm PDT #8485 of 10000
Bag the crypto. Say what is on your mind.

"white-plus-sign" is committed to white. The "transparent" color val works fine with backgrounds that are not white.


Jon B. - Oct 25, 2004 5:07:51 pm PDT #8486 of 10000
A turkey in every toilet -- only in America!

Sorry -- I meant that we could change the white-plus-sign to transparent and it would do what it's currently doing as well as the spoiler font stuff.

t edit In fact, if we're talking about letting people change the background color, then we have to change the white-plus-sign class to work with that.