Oakland Childrens as been wonderful with both my kids - they have each had to go through some pretty major medical stuff and everyone was so fantastic. When we had to go to UCSF Med Center for some treatment for K-Bug, while they were aso very good, it was different. They did not seem as attuned to working with kids, it was like fitting a kid into an adult set-up while all of Childrens is scaled to the kids.
Spike's Bitches 34: They're All Slime and Antlers
[NAFDA] Spike-centric discussion. Lusty, lewd (only occasionally crude), risque (and frisque), bawdy (Oh, lawdy!), flirty ('cuz we're purty), raunchy talk inside. Caveat lector.
Bitches? We're going to need a new title soon. I mentioned in B'crxy, but no one bit.
Okay. Here's what the random generator gave me...
Spike: We got a history, him and me.
Fred: What?
Spike: It was a long time ago. He was a young Watcher, fresh out of the academy when we crossed paths. It was a, what-you-call battle of wills and blood was spilled. Vendettas were sworn. It was a whole--
Fred: My God you're so full of crap.
Spike: Yeah. Okay.
Spike's Bitches 35: So Full of Crap
Spike's Bitches 35: Yeah. Okay.
Spike's Bitches 35: Vendettas Were Sworn
OOoo. I also like:
Spike's Bitches 35: We Got a History
...and now the Buffybot gives me:
"I wanna hurt you, but I can't resist the sinister attraction of your cold and muscular body!"
Spike's Bitches 35: Unable to Resist Sinsister Attractions
Sinsister
I kind of love this typo. That's what the Bitches are, man...a buncha Sinsisters.
I like "We got a history"
I responded!
I like Kristin's too!
Um, yeah. When a trained professional, someone who does this for a living and spends her workdays conferring with other professionals, expects her professional judgment to be given a certain amount of weight (very different from that "best and only" bullshit), that's just irrational. The very word
This! This is what is completely batshit insane to me. I mean I don't ask my lawyer friends for advice (which they are giving for free because they're good guys), and then turn around and say "But no! I said I wanted to sue them! You're not telling me how to sue them! You're telling me my case isn't well founded and I may have to seek other recourse!" Because they would then think I was craxy and no longer be my friends. And if they did think I had the special fruit loops and so decided not to dispense anymore advice, I wouldn't come back with, "You just don't want to give me advice anymore because I won't do things YOUR way! It's totally not because I'm batshit insane with the wanting to sue all the time!"
I would not do any of that because that is not how rational adults act.
When a trained professional, someone who does this for a living and spends her workdays conferring with other professionals, expects her professional judgment to be given a certain amount of weight (very different from that "best and only" bullshit), that's just irrational. The very word.
Ok, this made me snorkle because in the critical thinking class I just finished, there was a whole thing about how professionals have more credibility over laymen (heh - laymen) BECAUSE IT IS WHAT THEY DO.
As for titles? I suggest Spikes Bitches 35: Halfway to Happyland