Jim, if you can participate in the Un-American thread and still manage to ignore her, you have much better mental filters than I do.
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
cereal?
That last by me was kind of an X-post with Paul and askye.
I think what we issued to Zoe yesterday, has to remain without teeth, because that's how it was written and that's the spirit in which ita sent it.
However - if I'm reading correctly, and since the time of the toothless thingy, there are now redoubled efforts at being annoying (I haven't seen them, I've been elsewhere), then since we already sent the toothless thing, I think we're looking at an official warning this time. I would hope everyone would agree.
Was the Official Stompy Notice sent yesterday or Saturday? I say we give it a few days, and in the meantime try extra hard to NFTEC. ("A few days" is pretty vague because my feelings on this matter are pretty weak. I'm trying to think in general terms rather than about this specific situation, and it's not easy.)
How long is long enough to wait when you know that the unofficial notice/intervention has done as much good as pissing into the wind?
If we want to warn based on before-yesterday (i.e. before-notice) materials, then too long is never enough. If we have new, last-24-hours offenses that you all think are warn-worthy, let's go ahead and see citations, and go forward with the system. That's how the system works.
(Personally, I haven't got through all the threads yet, but I haven't found anything really warn-worthy yet. I'm trying not to jump immediately to the worst conclusion, although I may end up there eventually.)
Fair enough. Sorry if I overreacted.
You didn't. Here have some cookies. And by cookies I mean porn. And by porn I mean monkey.
I don't think there's any trolling, here - it's about a lack of comprehension of certain norms of behaviour.
But why should we have to put up with the repeated and persistent failure to conform to board etiquette?
Can't I just have the porn?
Wolfram always means monkey, Dana. Don't take his porn (or cookies).
You can keep the monkey porn to yourself, I'll take the cookies.
Dana - Micole - you have mail.