I am thirding the more Allyson around here posts. I am sorry the discussion makes folk crazy. It doesn't bother me at all--a LOTof Buffiistas like to put their two cents in, and then you end up with endless opinion-o-rama, but this crowd has opinions on everything, so behavior isn't treated any differently than corsets or baseball or recipes. I skim over any subject when my eyes start to glaze over or my teeth clench.
'Conviction (1)'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
People were suggesting possibilities re: my non-existence as a physical entity. --Deena
Warnings and suspensions look pretty mild next to that!
I am thirding
Heh. If we vote, can we get more Allyson around here?
...it was a JOKE, people! Really!
(Well, the wanting more Allyson isn't a joke; the wanting a vote IS.)
I vote that I receive a Federal subsidy to have Allyson follow me around and make snarky comments to people who annoy me.
You can't vote before you propose, Victor.
Victor can't propose! He's already married.
But... but... I'm an anarchist! That's the whole point!
But... but... I'm an anarchist! That's the whole point!
To marriage? Most certainly. ;)
300+ posts in Bureacracy and not one from yours truly. Agree with most of the stuff. I was one of Z's biggest defender in the Allyson kerfuffle, and now I'm beginning to see Allyson's side. A warning was long-deserved.
On a separate note, Allyson, I'm sorry you've found this board less than ideal, and I'm sorry for anything I did to contribute to that feeling. Please come back.
Process Geeks Unite!!
As soon as they have enough comments they say "OK, we've have enough info" and ask that comments stop, possibly waiting for potential warnee to say something if enough time has not been given.
Gar, I'm thinking, where Bureaucracy is a place that people make administrative decisions, this may work. But where Bureaucracy is a place that people express their feelings? Not so good. I know that the latter isn't entirely pertinent to the decision-making process nor to the Stompy informational needs, but it's part of what happens. I don't think, once begun, that an emotional outpouring can be stopped on command.
Me, I like to see it all talked out, even the endless circular stuff, because it satisfies a confessional need among the posters and it allows us all to try to think out our positions as we argue pro/con whatever's on the table. I mean, I'm never pleased when Bureaucracy balloons with unhappiness, but inasmuch as the unhappiness is expressed openly and acknowledged by all, and inasmuch as we're all working to minimize unhappiness, I feel good about how we use Bureaucracy. Even the repetitive and boring parts. That are repetitive. And redundant.