Know what? Who are you people?
We're Buffistas.
Illyria: We cling to what is gone. Is there anything in this life but grief? Wesley: There's love. There's hope...for some. There's hope that you'll find something worthy...that your life will lead you to some joy...that after everything...you can still be surprised. Illyria: Is that enough? Is that enough to live on?
'Shells'
Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
bicyclops - Mar 20, 2003 5:37:57 pm PST #8375 of 10001
Cindy - Mar 20, 2003 5:38:23 pm PST #8376 of 10001
Nobody
askye - We need 4 seconds (so a proposer and then 4 more people). I think Wolfram only has 2 seconds. I don't know why we're waiting 'til midnight though for a discussion if there were enough seconds. That doesn't make sense.
I'd like to recommend we only have one item on the table in the discussion thread at the same time. It seems to me Sophia's proposal should go all the way through the process and discussion (on that item) should close and go to a vote before another topic can get discussed there. Otherwise? We'll get dizzy.
bitterchick - Mar 20, 2003 5:38:28 pm PST #8377 of 10001
Not to further muddy the issue...though it's so freaking murky now I can't see my hand in front of my face...but did we ever make a decision about discussing multiple proposals at once? Like, Sophia's proposal got the requisite number of seconds first. So it holds first place in the discussion line. If someone else proposes something now, do we talk about them simultaneously or do we wait until next week to deal with proposal #2?
Cindy - Mar 20, 2003 5:39:18 pm PST #8378 of 10001
Nobody
Know what? Who are you people?
What the fuck is that supposed to mean?
Doblerize. Everyone.
Sophia Brooks - Mar 20, 2003 5:39:22 pm PST #8379 of 10001
Cats to become a rabbit should gather immediately now here
I think it can be opened now.
I just didn't want to end the voting at 7:38 board time, but we can!
bicyclops - Mar 20, 2003 5:39:25 pm PST #8380 of 10001
I think Wolfram only has 2 seconds.
3
Jessica - Mar 20, 2003 5:40:15 pm PST #8381 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset
One discussion at a time, I think.
Although I don't know if that was ever (oh god kill me now) formally voted on.
John H - Mar 20, 2003 5:40:19 pm PST #8382 of 10001
Know what? Who are you people?
What the fuck is that supposed to mean?
I think Allyson's head exploded there Gandalfe. I don't think it's a good idea to get into a fight about it here.
Cindy - Mar 20, 2003 5:40:34 pm PST #8383 of 10001
Nobody
There's no reason we can't futch with the times between discussion and voting and let it all happen at a good time for the people who are going to post the ballot in press, Sophia.
Hil R. - Mar 20, 2003 5:40:39 pm PST #8384 of 10001
Sometimes I think I might just move up to Vermont, open a bookstore or a vegan restaurant. Adam Schlesinger, z''l
but did we ever make a decision about discussing multiple proposals at once?
I think the only way it makes sense is if we don't. I don't really see us ever having so many things to decide that we'd need to overlap, and if we do have something time-sensitive it can be moved up on the list if it has to.