I think it can be opened now.
I just didn't want to end the voting at 7:38 board time, but we can!
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I think it can be opened now.
I just didn't want to end the voting at 7:38 board time, but we can!
I think Wolfram only has 2 seconds.
3
One discussion at a time, I think.
Although I don't know if that was ever (oh god kill me now) formally voted on.
Know what? Who are you people?
What the fuck is that supposed to mean?
I think Allyson's head exploded there Gandalfe. I don't think it's a good idea to get into a fight about it here.
There's no reason we can't futch with the times between discussion and voting and let it all happen at a good time for the people who are going to post the ballot in press, Sophia.
but did we ever make a decision about discussing multiple proposals at once?
I think the only way it makes sense is if we don't. I don't really see us ever having so many things to decide that we'd need to overlap, and if we do have something time-sensitive it can be moved up on the list if it has to.
It seems to me Sophia's proposal should go all the way through the process and discussion (on that item) should close and go to a vote before another topic can get discussed there.
I'm not sure I like the idea of one proposal bumping another. But since the thread can be reopened as soon as the other goes to a vote, it's only a four day hold. I can live with that.
There's no reason we can't futch with the times between discussion and voting and let it all happen at a good time for the people who are going to post the ballot in press, Sophia.
True. I don't think anyone's going to be upset if the discussion time is 4 days + 4 hours. We can open discussion now, and leave all the other start/end times the same.
Let's institute some bullshit consensus on that one, can't we? It's how we've been operating. We've been taking one issue at a time. The issue might spawn mulitiple questions, but first we did voting. Then we did whatever that last thing was. Now we're talking on closing issues.
I was going to ask something else but I'll just wait.