This here's a recipe for unpleasantness.

Mal ,'Objects In Space'


Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


Rebecca Lizard - Mar 18, 2003 10:04:16 pm PST #7915 of 10001
You sip / say it's your crazy / straw say it's you're crazy / as you bicycle your soul / with beauty in your basket

I'm going to take a moment and check my reading comprehension. Where does "RL is backing John" imply that RL is doing with anything less than her own informed volition?

I don't, in fact, have the right understanding of the word "backing"?

I should really, really go to bed? 


§ ita § - Mar 18, 2003 10:05:31 pm PST #7916 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

I don't, in fact, have the right understanding of the word "backing"?

My understanding of "backing" is supporting. What is yours?


Allyson - Mar 18, 2003 10:06:42 pm PST #7917 of 10001
Wait, is this real-world child support, where the money goes to buy food for the kids, or MRA fantasyland child support where the women just buy Ferraris and cocaine? -Jessica

RL, you usually back John.

Hec usually porns with Bitches.

These are usual things that happen, here, which illustrated other usual ways people deal with the rather not unusual Mieskes of the world.

Were you worried that people thought you were being a sheep? Because I'm sort of taken aback by the way you jumped to that conclusion. You sort of pulled it out of thin air.


Rebecca Lizard - Mar 18, 2003 10:07:59 pm PST #7918 of 10001
You sip / say it's your crazy / straw say it's you're crazy / as you bicycle your soul / with beauty in your basket

What is yours?

Throwing weight behind. I... heard a "just" before the "backing" part.

Oh hell. Sorry.

That third-person thing is just so seductive.


§ ita § - Mar 18, 2003 10:09:06 pm PST #7919 of 10001
Well not canonically, no, but this is transformative fiction.

Throwing weight behind

I think you can do that without being mindcontrolled too, you know.


Laura - Mar 18, 2003 10:12:59 pm PST #7920 of 10001
Our wings are not tired.

Jumping in at the end to post here what I put already in Press. If you have any questions let me know. 'Night all. {{{All of ya}}}

94 voters total. Most the first day. Give you the breakdown for that sometime later.

edit - and it doesn't fit so try again.


P.M. Marc - Mar 18, 2003 10:13:16 pm PST #7921 of 10001
So come, my friends, be not afraid/We are so lightly here/It is in love that we are made; In love we disappear

HAHAHAHAHA!

42

Dude.

That's too perfect.

And, basically, what Brenda said. But man, 42.


Betsy HP - Mar 18, 2003 10:14:07 pm PST #7922 of 10001
If I only had a brain...

I find the harmonic beauty of "42" breathtaking.

Mmmmmmm.


Rebecca Lizard - Mar 18, 2003 10:15:06 pm PST #7923 of 10001
You sip / say it's your crazy / straw say it's you're crazy / as you bicycle your soul / with beauty in your basket

I think you can do that without being mindcontrolled too, you know.

Yeah. I am feeling the stupid right now. I'm sorry, Allyson?


Laura - Mar 18, 2003 10:15:20 pm PST #7924 of 10001
Our wings are not tired.

The summary:

ITEM 1: FORMAL DISCUSSION THREAD
Do we want a separate thread for actual voting discussions?
Yes

ITEM 2: CLOSE DISCUSSION
Do we want to close the talking about a subject when the voting starts?
Yes

ITEM 3: VOTER TURNOUT
How many Buffistas does it take to make a vote count?
42
Do votes of "no preference" count toward this?
Yes

ITEM 4: SECONDS
a) Should more than one Buffista be needed in order to move something to formal discussion and vote?
Yes

b) Please choose a minimum number of people who have to agree with the original proposer before a proposal moves to formal discussion, if the above item passes.
4

ITEM 1: FORMAL DISCUSSION THREAD

Yes

53 61.6%   No 33 38.4%   No Preference 8     Total Votes with preference 86     ITEM 2: CLOSE DISCUSSION Yes 50 57.5%   No 37 42.5%   No Preference 7     Total Votes with preference 87     ITEM 3: VOTER TURNOUT How many Buffistas does it take to make a vote count? Mean 42 3961/94 Median 42 The middle number Mode 50 Favored by 24 voters Do votes of "no preference" count toward this? Yes 72 78.3%   No 20 21.7%   No Preference 2     Total Votes with preference 92     ITEM 4: SECONDS Should more than one Buffista be needed in order to move something to formal discussion and vote? Yes 78 86.7%   No 12 13.3%   No Preference 4     Total Votes with preference 90     Minimum number of people who have to agree with the original proposer before a proposal moves to formal discussion, if the above item passes.   Mean 4 369/94 Median 4 The middle choice Mode 5 Favored by 27 voters


Raw numbers for minimum number of Buffistas:

2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 8, 10, 10, 10, 10, 15, 15, 15, 18, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 20, 25, 25, 25, 25, 25, 25, 25, 25, 30, 30, 30, 30, 30, 30, 35, 35, 40, 40, 40, 40, 40, 40, 40, 42, 45, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 50, 51, 51, 60, 60, 60, 65, 65, 65, 65, 67, 67, 75, 77, 80, 80, 90, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100, 100
Raw numbers for numbers of seconds:

1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 2, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 3, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 4, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 5, 6, 6, 7, 7, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10, 10