I didn't
have
to do anything, Gar, I chose to do it. But thanks for your support.
OK I'm trying to remain calm here. Some points.
Each and every one of you who are here posting that it's a pity we had to ban him this time, I can go back to earlier times and cut-and-paste you posting how it was a good thing that we banned him the first time.
The rules say you get banned, you stay away, you get to come back. All he ever had to do was stay away, then come back. He came back, in violation of the ban, twice.
The Schmoker personality -- and here I feel like Spike explaining Ben/Glory, there
is
no Schmoker -- was just the third time he came back.
There are two viewpoints on what he did as Schmoker. He either deliberately dropped hints that he was Mieskie to annoy members of the board, or he was just very stupid. Either way it was destabilising.
The willingness of people to bend over backward to accomodate him tells me that if he had come clean, when challenged -- not just by me remember -- he would have been allowed to stay, after a time-out of some kind.
But he chose not to. He chose to get outraged and lie openly to us. At that point people were saying things like "OK John, are you satisfied now? Can we stop the witch-hunt?". And now those same people are still blaming
me
for causing conflict, and feeling sorry for him? That hurts so much.
PMM said he never lied to her. Yes he did. Every post was a lie, plus there was an open, public lie on Bureacracy. Which he has since deleted.
I agree with Brenda, and with Plei. And, John, I'm sorry this situation bothers you so much. I think what's operating here is my Internet/real life divide -- I can tolerate basically anything on here as long as it's grammatical and not a direct attack on other posters. And he didn't harass us, he didn't scam us, he didn't even really flame us. He just stirred up some shit, more than is the norm around here. And he lied about who he was. Those are errors in judgement, sure, but they aren't on my list of Mortal Sins.
I'm sorry this is causing so much divisiveness, mostly. I wanna sing kumbaya or something.
Oh, and point of order?
I didn't take any major part in the banning of Mieskie or the decision.
I would a thousand time rather have an asshole in our midst who was openly, non-divisively saying things like
I kinda like being stomped. Not trying if you're not causing trouble.
and that he wanted a Betsy HP sexbot of his own to play with, than have an asshole in disguise going around "reassuring" people...
EDIT: My point is that he was better inside the tent pissing in than inside the tent
pretending not to be
pissing in.
Won't be around for a while, but not in a sulky way. In a have-to-go-into-town-and-do-stuff way. Back later.
He didn't harass us, he didn't scam us, he didn't even really flame us
Yes he did! That was the whole point of him being suspened in the first place.
He was rude, he made inappropriate comments about other users, he picked fights and arguements.
And he did SCAM US. He scammed us when registered as Schmoker.
Look the rules are clear:
You are suspended and you don't come back for 2 months under ANY NAME. If you do you are BANNED.
And you know what? If for some reason, somewhere down the line, I'm suspended and I ever try to sneak back in under a new name before my 2 months are up, I hope that y'all ban my ass. Because those are the RULES and they need to be enforced.
When we make rules and don't enforce them then the rules are useless. No one is going to pay attention to them. Ever.
Gotta go to dance, be back later.
I move the conversation be closed. Any seconds?
Come explain to me why jockstraps are buttless.
Because the jockstrap just needs to secure the guy's package. It doesn't hurt if the glutes are bouncing around. And the design creates one little secure zone with the strappy parts, which would be less secure if it were trying to encompass the bum.
See?
I don't want to talk about the other stuff.
