Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I'm not going to step in and say, "whoah there, folks!" because I don't really know whether this is in violation of the standards or not.
Consuela, it's not a violation. I'm trying to think of what standards Bitches have, and I'm not coming up with any that say you can't ask what the heck is going on. If it's backrubs, we'll invite you. If it's a flamewar--which I've never seen over there--someone will advise you to duck.
And the problem we're having is that unless you pay close attention, the difference isn't obvious.
I'm with you on this. I mean, it's not that hard for
me
to tell what's going on and when someone might be pushing things. But when we say to newbies
"read, listen, learn"
and then jump on missteps, we might consider that the fact that there are RL (or backchannel) relationships going on that make some of this stuff ok might not be all that clear to someone who just found this place.
(I'll offer up the last 50 or so Natter posts as an example.)
The couple of times that these problems have gotten to the point that we've banned or discussed banning, it was new people offending but then refusing to accept that someone taking offense was a valid reaction. But in terms of the generally unwelcoming environment that some people are perceiving, maybe this is an element to consider.
Yeah, well, it was a hypothetical. My point stands, though: we're all under an obligation to enforce our community standards, if they're as important as we all seem to think they are; the problem is that context is everything, and what's appropriate between two Buffistas in thread A may be complete out of line in thread D.
You know what distinction's important here? What's okay
here
and what's okay to say to any individual. It might be okay to call someone an insane fucko on this board, but if you're talking to Betsy, you'd damned well better know something specific about you and Betsy. There's no hypocrisy there, no obscure community standards -- that's about relating to specific people.
But much more importantly than that, if I've called anyone anything in the past, and they are offended by it tomorrow, it's polite of me to go "Oh. Umm. Sorry? Sorry." Not "What a double standard! I called you that yesterday!"
IRL with old friends, I say things are do things that offend. I apologises. In new groups, I say very little , unless we are talking about something realtively impersonal ( and i have a passion for) , like books. So I rarley offend people I have just met.
I am not a good aplogiser (and a piss poor speller). I like to make excuses and explain. Ask DH. But I am tryingto learn. And it is easier on line where I can look at my posts and say --oops that isn't what I am trying to do or say here.
Anyway, because of that - I don't tend to call people on their behavior if I have just met them. I watch or listen and decide if it is a pattern, I don't like the person, or they just get on my nerves. If it is someone I like -- i might eventually say something. If it someone well liked on the board -- It might take me longer. Depends how personally I am invovled. In meatspace I'm quicker --cause things can get physical faster.
Anyway, I do see some discussions get hotter because person a doesn't want to listen. And then person b stops listening and Then C jumps in. At the moment it seems to be happening to new members of the board. But, it happened a bunch with old members durring last seasons Buffy. I suspect we are having pains now caused by 1) growth, 2) a bad experience, 3) some confusion about what will happen if there are no ME shows.
I think that we will get over this hump and do just fine.
edited : because even one word can make things clearer
Just FTR, I'm not saying there's no difference between some of the back-and-forth between folks here and a newbie jumping in and saying the same thing. Just that, when it happens, we might give the intent a little more benefit of the doubt when we call someone on the actual post.
But much more importantly than that, if I've called anyone anything in the past, and they are offended by it tomorrow, it's polite of me to go "Oh. Umm. Sorry? Sorry." Not "What a double standard! I called you that yesterday!"
Hell yes. And it's that attitude that needs stomping, more than someone misjudging their tone or making an unfortunate remark.
[Or, more relevant to our situation - "What a double standard! So-and-so called you that just the other day, so how the hell can you pretend to be offended now?"]
I'm with you on this. I mean, it's not that hard for me to tell what's going on and when someone might be pushing things. But when we say to newbies "read, listen, learn" and then jump on missteps, we might consider that the fact that there are RL (or backchannel) relationships going on that make some of this stuff ok might not be all that clear to someone who just found this place.
Why wouldn't it be clear to Joe Newbie that some people know each other better than Joe Newbie knows anyone? Why wouldn't it be clear that friends can tease each other over subjects and in ways that strangers can't? I'm having a hard time wording this, but I think most people do or should comprehend that when they're new at a board, of course some of the people at a board are already friends (of varying degrees of intimacy) with one another.
I am worried that some of this discussion isn't growing out of a real problem, but rather that it's growing out of the seeds of malcontent that mieskie sowed; when he was called on things, I didn't so much feel that he really did not know the difference between one of us blathering about a secret crush and him making lewd comments about a teenagers breasts. I think he was rules lawyering, so that he could continue making lewd comments about a teenager's breasts or any other kind of offensive attack. That doesn't mean I think anyone should be bounced (or even always warned) the first time s/he makes a social gaffe. But please remember even if people are new here, they're not (hopefully) new to living among the human race. Of course you can say things to someone you've known a long time that a relative stranger could not say. I think a newbie should go to any community equipped with that basic bit of social knowledge.
I'll add two things. Newbies - I'm also pretty new here. I have no props earned. Also, I think we've gotten mostly splendid newbies, with only one difficulty and he was suspended.
I’ve seen it denied here, but the naked truth is that this community does have a distinct tendency to tell newbies “shut up and wait” in no uncertain terms.
I'm so new here that sometimes I even offend myself. Although my opinion may not matter much to some, I want the old-timers to know that newbies get excellent treatment here. Newbie posts are never flamed or disparaged, you don't hear old-timers constantly nagging newbies to read the FAQ, or saying such-and-such was discussed just last week. At worst a newbie post may be ignored.
I also want to say its refreshing that this community is very open about everything. I'm gratified that stompy feeters and other buffista old-timers discuss "housekeeping" issues in open forums and give even newbies a chance to give input on these topics. I'm sure it would be tempting to have an "admin" only thread with password access or limited posting ability and I'm glad there's none here. It's like the Sunshine Act.