Joyce: You don't think it's too obvious? I think I look like I have a cat on my head. Buffy: But a very well groomed cat. Joyce: Well that's a comfort.

'Bring On The Night'


Bureaucracy 1: Like Kafka, Only Funnier  

A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.

Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych


Anne W. - Jan 02, 2003 1:12:06 pm PST #2215 of 10001
The lost sheep grow teeth, forsake their lambs, and lie with the lions.

I think this question is also about just posting a link in the thread they're in saying "We're talking about you in Bureaucracy. Come on over and have your say."

Good idea. I think, though, that the exact wording should be "we're talking about this in Bureaucracy, etc." to make it a little clearer that we're criticizing the behavior and not the person. In some cases, poor behavior is due solely to cluelessness/bad day/cramps, and not to any defect in personality.


Jessica - Jan 02, 2003 1:13:00 pm PST #2216 of 10001
And then Ortus came and said "It's Ortin' time" and they all Orted off into the sunset

Allow the person to e-mail the stompies, and if the stompies think he or she has a point, they can open the discussion here.

I really, really dislike this idea, because it changes the Stompies from posters with administrative capabilities to a governing body. Not that I don't trust them, but that's not supposed to be how this place works.

Bureaucracy is one of the few threads that is always visible to anyone, subscribed or not, because of its place in the sidebar. It's completely open to every member of this community. Anyone can see the number of new posts shoot up and decide they want to know what's going on and put in their two cents.

I'm a neutral vote on the extra threads question. Personally, I'm against thread proliferation for the reasons ita outlined, but I also know that eventually, we will create them, so why fight it?


Nilly - Jan 02, 2003 1:13:47 pm PST #2217 of 10001
Swouncing

So far, counting only votes that were cast 'as votes', we have 9 for yes, 2 for no and 3 4 abstinating (sp?).

Lyra Jane's numbers show an even bigger majority for the 'yes' camp.

[Edited to include Jess' vote]


Rebecca Lizard - Jan 02, 2003 1:13:47 pm PST #2218 of 10001
You sip / say it's your crazy / straw say it's you're crazy / as you bicycle your soul / with beauty in your basket

Well, I wasn't advocating that exactly, just saying it was a point. I'm sort of slightly ambivilant; although fucked if I can remember how to spell it. And I definetely wouldn't go with that exact phrasing.

Earlier, I commented on how no one linked to this thread in Firefly before....


billytea - Jan 02, 2003 1:14:41 pm PST #2219 of 10001
You were a wrong baby who grew up wrong. The wrong kind of wrong. It's better you hear it from a friend.

I think this question is also about just posting a link in the thread they're in saying "We're talking about you in Bureaucracy. Come on over and have your say."

This is a distinction that bothers me. "You can mount your own defence if you realise you're under review and can find where the discussion is going on." If we're talking about action as serious as suspension, then I don't think the quality (indeed, the presence) of a defence should be decided by the non-offence related factors.

Edit: I don't know if anyone is proposing such a position, so this isn't directed at anyone. In particular, it's not directed at the messenger.


Laura - Jan 02, 2003 1:15:03 pm PST #2220 of 10001
Our wings are not tired.

If we are discussing suspending someone in this thread I think they should be pointed here to defend themselves in the official warning. It may well shorten the time spent on the unpleasantness as the person may either understand where they are violating community standards and change or decide to leave.


Rebecca Lizard - Jan 02, 2003 1:15:05 pm PST #2221 of 10001
You sip / say it's your crazy / straw say it's you're crazy / as you bicycle your soul / with beauty in your basket

I'm a wishy-washy yes. It won't mean that a little music natter, when it arises in Bitches or Natter, will get stomped, right? No more than a talk of books in Bitches last week was stomped.


David J. Schwartz - Jan 02, 2003 1:16:57 pm PST #2222 of 10001
New, fully poseable Author!Knut.

I'm gonna go pout in the corner cause I like the big group places.

I love the idea of Natter as a big cocktail party that never ends, where everyone is there chatting and flirting and porning. But realistically, I can't keep up. I miss a lot. I can't imagine I'm the only one. I'd like a music thread because there I could learn from Hec and Hayden and perhaps occassionally (sp?) add an intelligent comment of my own.

HI KNUT!!!!! (an excellent example of people I NEVER SEE ANYMORE!!)

I'm right here! (Hugs msbelle)


David J. Schwartz - Jan 02, 2003 1:19:29 pm PST #2223 of 10001
New, fully poseable Author!Knut.

It won't mean that a little music natter, when it arises in Bitches or Natter, will get stomped, right? No more than a talk of books in Bitches last week was stomped.

That's not the intention of the thread. Natter will e'er be Natter, and no one's going to tell the Bitches what to do. A music thread will just be a little more tightly focused discussion.


Burrell - Jan 02, 2003 1:20:23 pm PST #2224 of 10001
Why did Darth Vader cross the road? To get to the Dark Side!

Raising another issue here: in practical terms, how would we go about preventing a person from joining in a discussion about whether to suspend/ban them?

Honestly, I don't think we could prevent someone who *knew enough* about Buffista etiquette to come here to discuss the subject. That's the key. Most of the trouble we'll have will be with folks who drop in looking for a fight, not with longtime Buffistas. But say I *knew* that there was talk of me going on in Bureaucracy--I'd come and post my defense. And I would be pissed as hell if I was told that I was explicitly not allowed to defend myself publically, I had to go through the admins.

I'm less sanguine about a specific movie thread - that's the kind of thing I'd like to see stay in Natter.

There's no justification for creating a general interest thread for Music but not for Movies that I can see. As much as I hate the idea, if we are creating more general threads, there's no reason not to create Cooking or Eating or Painting or Rock Climbing or whatever threads.