I'll be happy if it's not him talking to himself. It was a nagging suspicion, that's all.
His first few posts today were fairly interesting. It's just the interaction that he can't do.
Xander ,'Empty Places'
A thread to discuss naming threads, board policy, new thread suggestions, and anything else that has to do with board administration and maintenance. Guaranteed to include lively debate and polls. Natter discouraged, but not deleted.
Current Stompy Feet: ita, Jon B, DXMachina, P.M. Marcontell, Liese S., amych
I'll be happy if it's not him talking to himself. It was a nagging suspicion, that's all.
His first few posts today were fairly interesting. It's just the interaction that he can't do.
I don't think the 192 address will register in the server logs. I'm pretty sure it's NATed out.
What I can tell you from the logs, is that for the 24th, 25th and a wee bit of the 26th, people came to us from the following hosts:
One of the IP addresses was an URL that translates to Spanish. The other two I can't get to through my firewall.
This is a total of 547 referrals, with the most being from whedonesque, fireflyfans.net, twop, the official FF board, scifi.com, and google, in that order.
I blame Shrift.
I think that's probably the list of what sites the posters were at when they linked to us, no?
Yeah, ita, are those the HTTP_REFERER addresses? Not the same as the REMOTE_IP or whatever?
I think that's probably the list of what sites the posters were at when they linked to us, no?
Yup, that's it. If by "linked" you mean "clicked through".
And groups.google.com means USENET, effectively.
edit: Yup, referrals, hosts they were at when they came here ...
I blame Shrift.
Hey! What did I do?
If the trolls are finding their way here because of me, then... then... I guess I'll delete all of my websites and go *poof* in a BNF snit of epic proportions!!!
t puts a gun to the BRQG's head
I'll Minear it, I swear I will!
Seriously, though, I can take some links down, but I think Variety has a wider readership than I do. I'm just sayin'.
The trolling has been surprisingly light. Just the two (or two and a half), really. I'm hoping that it's nothing more than 2002 getting its last licks in before we take it out to the back forty to put it out of its misery.
eriously, though, I can take some links down, but I think Variety has a wider readership than I do. I'm just sayin'.
Doubt that.
More interesting would be the IP addresses of the machines used to make the posts. Some web servers log that.