Hey, all. Warm affirmations of righteousness from somebody who's still in the middle of catchup. We're doing well with the reasonableness, and more to the point, with the "Hey, other Buffistas, do you agree?"-ness of it all. So, monkey-grooming gestures all around.
Personally I'm more than a little weird on the notion that a ten year old is reading our boards, but then, I'm a little weird on the 14- and 16- year old readers. I resolve this cognitive dissonance by becoming blind any time Holli, RL, et al. mention their real ages. (Teenagers are sort of borderline, and can probably be judged "mature" individually, but I don't think many would say that a ten year old is mature.) I do secretly fret about it. Don't think I don't.
The Constitutional argument about the managing of just this kind of situation went on and on and on ...
Heh. I do wonder sometimes, though, about the process. I can only think of a very few times when groups of our own, self-identified, time-length-irrelevant Buffistas have offended each other, and so far, correct me if I'm wrong Stompy Feet, so far all of those intra-Buffista disputes have been resolved by personal (on-board or email) warning, rather than by official warning. Which basically works, or has seemed to work so far.
I hope this means that we are all so very averse to rancorous conflict that we collectively overreact on the side of nice. But it also means I worry, sometimes, about how we would all deal if we had to warn or suspend actual community members.
At the very least, we'd burn bandwidth angsting over it, which I guess would be a good, if painful, sign.